Prevalence of COVID-19 and long COVID - Results from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 50 states.
Adams, M. L.; Grandpre, J.
Show abstract
Recent MMWR results estimate long COVID prevalence at 6.0% in June 2023, while the percentage of those with COVID reporting long COVID was 11.0%. The 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System addressed COVID (positive test) and long COVID (symptoms lasting [≥]3 months) in a population-based sample from each state and DC. Results for 385,617 adults indicated 34.4% had ever had COVID, 21.9% of whom reported long COVID, representing 7.4% of all adults. State rates ranged from 25.4% - 40.8% for COVID and 4.1%- 11.1% for long COVID. Groups with high rates for both included women, younger adults, those with children in the household, plus those reporting obesity, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, or cardiovascular disease (CVD). Highest adjusted odds ratios for COVID were 2.34 (95% CI 2.20-2.49) for age 18-24 years vs. age 65+ while for long COVID it was 2.81 (2.53-3.13) for 3+ of the 5 conditions. Most frequently reported problems for those with long COVID were fatigue (26.0%), shortness of breath (18.8%), loss of taste or smell (17.2%), and memory problems (9.9%). Results show the need for state-based data and suggest a focus on younger adults is needed to address COVID and long COVID.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 94%
- Magnitude, pattern and correlates of multimorbidity among patients attending chronic outpatient medical care in Bahir Dar, northwest Ethiopia: the application of latent class analysis model 94%
- Geographic Disparities and Determinants of COVID-19 Incidence Risk in the Greater St. Louis Area, Missouri 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social support and ideal cardiovascular health in urban Jamaica: a cross-sectional study 93%
- Changes in the prevalence of the common risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Uganda between 2014 and 2023: Informed by nationally representative cross-sectional surveys 92%
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in COVID-19 Risk by Race and County-Level Social Determinants of Health Among Veterans 94%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Racial/Ethnic, Biomedical, and Sociodemographic Risk Factors for COVID-19 Positivity and Hospitalization in the San Francisco Bay Area 94%
- Differential Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Social Vulnerability on COVID-19 Positivity, Hospitalization, and Death in the San Francisco Bay Area 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 Heterogeneity by Ethnicity in Los Angeles 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States 91%
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 91%
- Association of Opioid Use Disorder With 2016 Presidential Voting Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study in New York State at Census Tract Level 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.