Back

Deep Learning-enabled Detection of Aortic Stenosis from Noisy Single Lead Electrocardiograms

Aminorroaya, A.; Dhingra, L. S.; Sangha, V.; Oikonomou, E. K.; Khunte, A.; Shankar, S. V.; Camargos, A. P.; Haynes, N.; Hofer, I.; Ouyang, D.; Nadkarni, G.; Khera, R.

2023-10-02 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.09.29.23296310 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDue to the lack of a feasible screening strategy, aortic stenosis (AS) is often diagnosed after the development of clinical symptoms, representing advanced stages of disease. Portable and wearable devices capable of recording electrocardiograms (ECGs) can be used for scalable screening for AS, if the diagnosis can be made with a single-lead ECG, despite potentially noisy acquisition. MethodsUsing electronic health records and imaging data from a large, diverse hospital system (2015-2022), we developed a deep learning-based approach to detect moderate/severe AS using a single-lead ECG. We used ECGs paired with echocardiograms obtained within 30 days of each other to develop the model. We extracted lead I signal data from clinical ECG and augmented it with random Gaussian noise. We trained a convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify TTE-confirmed AS using noisy single-lead ECGs. Finally, we used the CNN model probabilities, along with patient age and sex, as predictive inputs to train an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model to detect moderate/severe AS. ResultsThe model was developed in 75,901 ECGs/35,992 patients (median age 61 [interquartile range (IQR) 47-72] years, 54.3% women, 9.5% Black) and validated in 3,733 patients (median age 61 [IQR 47-72] years, 53.4% women, 9.7% Black). In the held-out validation set, the ensemble XGBoost model achieved an AUROC of 0.829 (95% CI: 0.800-0.855), with a sensitivity of 90.4% and specificity of 58.7% for detecting moderate/severe AS. For detecting severe AS, the models AUROC was 0.846 (95% CI, 0.778-0.899), with a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 57.0%. In the test set with a 4.5% prevalence of moderate/severe AS, the model had a PPV of 9.3% and an NPV of 99.2%. In simulated cohorts with 1% and 20% prevalence of moderate/severe AS, the models NPVs varied from 99.8% to 96.1%, and PPV from 2.2% to 35.4%, respectively. ConclusionWe developed a novel portable- and wearable-adapted deep learning approach for the detection of moderate/severe AS from noisy single-lead ECGs. Our approach represents a highly sensitive, feasible, and scalable strategy for community-based AS screening.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.6%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.4%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
15
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
17
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%
29
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%