Central pore-opening structure and gating of the mechanosensitive PIEZO1 channel
Liu, S.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, J.; Wang, L.; Yuan, J.; Liu, W.; Zhou, H.; Wu, K.; Tian, B.; Li, X.; Xiao, B.
Show abstract
PIEZO1 is a mechanically activated cation channel that undergoes force-induced activation and inactivation to control diverse physiological processes1-4. However, the distinct functional states and gating transitions remain structurally undefined. In response to changes in membrane forces, PIEZO1 transitions from a curved to a flattened shape, which might lead to opening and subsequent inactivation of the ion-conducting pore5,6. Here we employed a PIEZO1 mutant to capture various conformational states including an intermediate state with an opened central pore, allowing us to reveal the gating dynamics of this multiple-gate system. Upon transition from the curved to the partially flattened intermediate state, the trimeric cap undergoes a downward and rotational motion to open the lateral cap-gate, while the loop that connects the cap to the pore-lining inner helix acts as a spring-linker, switching from an extended to a compressed state. Along with the partial flattening of the peripheral blades, these conformational changes collectively dilate the cap-gate, spring-gate and the hydrophobic transmembrane-gate, leading to ion permeation through the transmembrane pore. Upon inactivation, while the blades remain flattened, the cap and spring-linker return to an up and extended state. Molecular dynamics simulations verify the ion-permeating pathway and the distinct ion-conducting states of the assigned close, intermediate, open, and inactivated structures. Mutagenesis and electrophysiological characterizations reveal that domains and residues involved in conformational dynamics of the cap and spring-linker are critical for mechanical activation of PIEZO1. Together, these studies have structurally defined the distinct functional states and the curvature-based activation and inactivation mechanisms of PIEZO1.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.