The disadvantaged immigrants made the most use of a prenatal consultation offered to future fathers in Seine Saint-Denis, France
Penot, P.; Jacob, G.; Guerizec, A.; Letembet, V.-A.; Trevisson, C.; Harich, R.; Phuong, T.; Renevier, B.; Manuellan, P.-E.; Desgrees du Lou, A.; Partage study group,
Show abstract
BackgroundPrenatal care provides pregnant women with repeated opportunities for prevention, screening and diagnosis that have no current extension to future fathers. It also contributes to womens general better access to health. The goal of PARTAGE study was to evaluate the level and determinants of adherence to a prenatal prevention consultation dedicated to men. MethodsBetween January 2021 and April 2022, we conducted a monocentric interventional study in Montreuil hospital. We assessed the acceptance of a prenatal prevention consultation newly offered to every future father, through their pregnant partners prior consent to provide their contact details. Results3,038 women provided contact information used to reach the fathers; effective contact was established with 2,516 men, of whom 1,333 (53%) came for prenatal prevention consultation. Immigrant men were more likely to come than French-born men (56% versus 49%, p < 0{middle dot}001), and the more they faced social hardship, the more likely they were to accept the offer. In multivariate analysis, men born in Subsaharan Africa and Asia were twice as likely to attend the consultation as those born in Europe or North America. ConclusionAcceptance of this new offer was high. Moreover, this consultation was perceived by vulnerable immigrant men as an opportunity to integrate a healthcare system they would otherwise remain deprived of. Trial Registrationhttps://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05085717
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Teenage pregnancy and timing of first marriage in Cameroon - What has changed over the last three decades, and what are the implications? 94%
- Exposure to trauma in pregnant women and its association with previous perinatal complications, IPV and antenatal service satisfaction in rural Ethiopia: a cross-sectional facility-based study 94%
- Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a ‘Born in Wales’ mixed methods study using routine data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex ratios and ‘missing women’ among Asian minority and migrant populations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A retrospective cohort analysis 93%
- Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: A linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK 93%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal trends of key preconception indicators among women in Northern Ireland, UK: An analysis of maternity healthcare data 2011-2021 92%
- Type of treatment matters for the association between conception through medically assisted reproduction and childhood cognition: A Danish population-wide cohort study 92%
- “Social distancing: barriers to its implementation and how they can be overcome – a rapid systematic review” 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informal coercion during childbirth: risk factors and prevalence estimates from a nationwide survey among women in Switzerland 95%
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 94%
- What are the mechanisms of effect of group antenatal care? A systematic realist review and synthesis of the literature 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic position and SARS-CoV-2 infections: seroepidemiological findings from a German nationwide dynamic cohort 91%
- Characteristics of those most vulnerable to employment changes during the Covid-19 pandemic: a nationally representative cross-sectional study in Wales 91%
- Long COVID and financial outcomes: Evidence from four longitudinal population surveys 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.