Back

An extended catalytic model to assess changes in risk for multiple reinfections with SARS-CoV-2

Lombard, B.; Cohen, C.; von Gottberg, A.; Dushoff, J.; van Schalkwyk, C.; Pulliam, J.

2023-09-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.09.27.23296231 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has illustrated that monitoring trends in multiple infections can provide insight into the biological characteristics of new variants. Following several pandemic waves, many people have already been infected and reinfected by SARS-CoV-2 and therefore methods are needed to understand the risk of multiple reinfections. ObjectivesIn this paper, we extended an existing catalytic model designed to detect increases in the risk of reinfection by SARS-CoV-2 to detect increases in the population-level risk of multiple reinfections. MethodsThe catalytic model assumes the risk of reinfection is proportional to observed infections and uses a Bayesian approach to fit model parameters to the number of nth infections among individuals whose (n - 1)th infection was observed at least 90 days before. Using a posterior draw from the fitted model parameters, a 95% projection interval of daily nth infections is calculated under the assumption of a constant nth infection hazard coefficient. An additional model parameter was introduced to consider the increased risk of reinfection detected during the Omicron wave. Validation was performed to assess the models ability to detect increases in the risk of third infections. Key FindingsThe model parameters converged when applying the models fitting and projection procedure to the number of observed third SARS-COV-2 infections in South Africa. No additional increase in the risk of third infection was detected after the increase detected during the Omicron wave. The validation of the third infections method showed that the model can successfully detect increases in the risk of third infections under different scenarios. LimitationsEven though the extended model is intended to detect the risk of nth infections, the method was only validated for detecting increases in the risk of third infections and not for four or more infections. The method is very sensitive to low numbers of nth infections, so it might not be usable in settings with small epidemics, low coverage of testing or early in an outbreak. ConclusionsThe catalytic model to detect increases in the risk of reinfections was successfully extended to detect increases in the risk of nth infections and could contribute to future detection of increases in the risk of nth infections by SARS-CoV-2 or other similar pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.