Evaluating goodness-of-fit of animal movement models using lineups
Fieberg, J.; Signer, J.; Freeman, S.
Show abstract
Models of animal movement are frequently fit to animal location data to understand how animals respond to and interact with local environmental features. Several open-source software packages are available for analyzing animal movements and can facilitate parameter estimation, yet there are relatively few methods available for evaluating model goodness-of-fit. We describe how a simple graphical technique, the lineup protocol, can be used to evaluate goodness-of-fit of integrated step-selection analyses and hidden Markov models, but the method can be applied much more broadly. We leverage the ability to simulate data from fitted models, and demonstrate the approach using both methods applied to fisher (Pekania pennanti) data. A variety of responses and movement metrics can be used to evaluate models, and the lineup protocol can be tailored to focus on specific model assumptions or movement features that are of primary interest. Although it is possible to evaluate goodness-of-fit using a formal hypothesis test, the method can also be used in a more exploratory fashion (e.g., to visualize variability in model behavior across stochastic simulations or identify areas where the model could be improved). We provide coded examples and two vignettes to demonstrate the flexibility of the approach and encourage movement ecologists to consider how their models will be applied when choosing appropriate graphical responses for evaluating goodness-of-fit.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- movedesign: Shiny R app to evaluate sampling design for animal tracking movement studies 97%
- Accounting for unobserved spatial variation in step selection analyses of animal movement via spatial random effects 97%
- Simulating animal space use from fitted integrated Step-Selection Functions (iSSF) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Can overlooking "invisible landscapes" bias habitat selection estimation and population distribution projections? 93%
- occAssess: An R package for assessing potential biases in species occurrence data 93%
- gauseR: Simple methods for fitting Lotka-Volterra models describing Gause's "Struggle for Existence" 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.