Back

Sex-Related Differences in Long-term Outcomes across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure Patients

Kawai, A.; WET-HF investivators, ; Nagatomo, Y.; Iwashita, M. Y.; Ikegami, Y.; Takei, M.; Kohno, T.; Goda, A.; Mizuno, A.; Kitamura, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Nakano, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Kohsaka, S.; Adachi, T.; Yoshikawa, T.

2023-09-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.09.26.23296192
Show abstract

BackgroundRecently, patients with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (snLVEF) are reported to have high risk of adverse outcomes, especially in women. We sought to evaluate sex-related differences in the association between LVEF and long-term outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. MethodsThe multicenter WET-HF Registry enrolled all patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF (ADHF). We analyzed 3,943 patients (age 77 years; 59.8% male) registered from 2006 to 2017. According to LVEF the patients were divided into the 3 groups: HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (HFpEF). The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of cardiac death and ADHF rehospitalization after discharge. ResultsImplementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) such as renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor (RASi), {beta}-blocker and their combination at discharge was significantly lower in women than men in HFmrEF. Lower prescription of RASi + {beta}-blocker combination in female HFmrEF was noted even after adjustment for covariates (p=0.007). There were no such sex-related differences in HFrEF. Female sex was associated with higher incidence of the primary endpoint and ADHF rehospitalization after adjustment for covariates exclusively in HFmrEF. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between LVEF and the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in women, but such relationship was not observed in men (p for interaction=0.037). ConclusionsIn women, not only lower LVEF but also snLVEF were associated with worse long-term outcomes. Additionally, sex-related differences in the GDMT implementation for HFmrEF highlight the need for sex-specific guidelines to optimize HF management.

Matching journals

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 0.9%
20× avg
2
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
175× avg
3
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 50%
10.3%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
54× avg
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 2%
18× avg
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
7
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.9%
28× avg
8
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
44× avg
9
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
30× avg
10
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
11
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
12
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 35%
2.5%
13
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 69%
1.8%
14
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 1%
21× avg
15
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
16
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
19× avg
17
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
23× avg
18
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 6%
3.8× avg
19
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 3%
7.7× avg
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 15%
0.8%