Sex-Related Differences in Long-term Outcomes across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction in Heart Failure Patients
Kawai, A.; WET-HF investivators, ; Nagatomo, Y.; Iwashita, M. Y.; Ikegami, Y.; Takei, M.; Kohno, T.; Goda, A.; Mizuno, A.; Kitamura, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Nakano, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Kohsaka, S.; Adachi, T.; Yoshikawa, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecently, patients with supra-normal left ventricular ejection fraction (snLVEF) are reported to have high risk of adverse outcomes, especially in women. We sought to evaluate sex-related differences in the association between LVEF and long-term outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. MethodsThe multicenter WET-HF Registry enrolled all patients hospitalized for acute decompensated HF (ADHF). We analyzed 3,943 patients (age 77 years; 59.8% male) registered from 2006 to 2017. According to LVEF the patients were divided into the 3 groups: HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) and preserved EF (HFpEF). The primary endpoint was defined as the composite of cardiac death and ADHF rehospitalization after discharge. ResultsImplementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) such as renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor (RASi), {beta}-blocker and their combination at discharge was significantly lower in women than men in HFmrEF. Lower prescription of RASi + {beta}-blocker combination in female HFmrEF was noted even after adjustment for covariates (p=0.007). There were no such sex-related differences in HFrEF. Female sex was associated with higher incidence of the primary endpoint and ADHF rehospitalization after adjustment for covariates exclusively in HFmrEF. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between LVEF and the hazard ratio of the primary endpoint in women, but such relationship was not observed in men (p for interaction=0.037). ConclusionsIn women, not only lower LVEF but also snLVEF were associated with worse long-term outcomes. Additionally, sex-related differences in the GDMT implementation for HFmrEF highlight the need for sex-specific guidelines to optimize HF management.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 96%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 95%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 95%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 95%
- Relationship of mild to moderate impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction with fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in cardiac sarcoidosis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Heart Failure Subtypes and Atrial fibrillation: Data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study 96%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 95%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 94%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.