Glacier extinction homogenizes functional diversity
Khelidj, N.; Caccianiga, M.; Cerabolini, B. E.; Tampucci, D.; Losapio, G.
Show abstract
QuestionsThe disappearance of glaciers threatens biodiversity and the functioning of ecosystems. To date, questions remain about the response of functional diversity to glacier extinction and its potential for adaptation to climate change. How does glacier retreat and extinction affect plant functional diversity? How do mean and variation of plant traits change with glacier retreat and extinction? LocationFour glacier ecosystems in Italian Alps. Plant communities spanning 0 to ca 5,000 years on average after glacier retreat. MethodsWe quantify how glacier retreat affects functional diversity of plant communities analysing twelve functional traits of 117 plant species across 170 plots. First, we addressed the impact of glacier retreat on functional divergence and functional homogeneity, analysing both trait average and trait variation. Next, we explored how biodiversity (i.e., plant species richness) influenced functional diversity and how glacier retreat affected such relationship. Finally, we explored the effects of glacier retreat on mean and variation of single traits associated to carbon and nitrogen cycling and resource allocation. ResultsGlacier retreat homogenizes functional diversity by reducing trait variation and making communities more functionally similar. While biodiversity positively contributes to trait heterogeneity, glacier retreat erodes the support of species richness to functional diversity. We also show how glacier extinction has medium to large negative effects on the average and variation of key functional traits associated to carbon economy, but small positive effects on leaf nitrogen content. ConclusionsOur results demonstrate the pervasive impact of glacier extinction on the functioning of plant communities. We stress that functional diversity and trait variation should be the focus of adaptation and mitigation actions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationships between aboveground plant traits and carbon cycling in tundra plant communities 95%
- Functional traits predict species responses to environmental variation in a California grassland annual plant community 95%
- Forest growth resistance and resilience to the 2018-2020 drought depend on tree diversity and mycorrhizal type 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The contribution of plant life and growth forms to global gradients of vascular plant diversity 95%
- Functional traits shape plant-plant interactions and recruitment in a hotspot of woody plant diversity. 95%
- Aridity drives coordinated trait shifts but not decreased trait variance across the geographic range of eight Australian trees 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nitrogen availability and plant functional composition modify biodiversity-multifunctionality relationships 95%
- Fast-slow traits predict competition network structure and its response to resources and enemies. 94%
- Predictions of biodiversity are improved by integrating trait-based competition with abiotic filtering 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linking microenvironment modification to species interactions and demography in an alpine plant community 95%
- The dominance of non-native plants over native plants increases with the number of global change factors 93%
- Plant-mycorrhizal associations may explain the latitudinal gradient of plant community assembly 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seasonal structural stability promoted by forest diversity and composition explains overyielding 95%
- Partitioning the colonization and extinction components of beta diversity: Spatiotemporal species turnover across disturbance gradients 94%
- Tree diversity effects on productivity depend on mycorrhizae and life strategies in a temperate forest experiment 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.