Back

CellPolaris: Decoding Cell Fate through Generalization Transfer Learning of Gene Regulatory Networks

Feng, G.; Qin, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, W.; Li, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, W.; Tian, Y.; Liu, Y.; Dong, J.; Xu, P.; Man, Z.; Liu, G.; Liang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, P.; Yang, G.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Tong, M.-H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.

2023-09-26 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.09.25.559244 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell fate changes are determined by gene regulatory network (GRN), a sophisticated system regulating gene expression in precise spatial and temporal patterns. However, existing methods for reconstructing GRNs suffer from inherent limitations, leading to compromised accuracy and application generalizability. In this study, we introduce CellPolaris, a computational system that leverages transfer learning algorithms to generate high-quality, cell-type-specific GRNs. Diverging from conventional GRN inference models, which heavily rely on integrating epigenomic data with transcriptomic information or adopt causal strategies through gene co-expression networks, CellPolaris employs high-confidence GRN sources for model training, relying exclusively on transcriptomic data to generate previously unknown cell-type-specific GRNs. Applications of CellPolaris demonstrate remarkable efficacy in predicting master regulatory factors and simulating in-silico perturbations of transcription factors during cell fate transition, attaining state-of-the-art performance in accurately predicting candidate key factors and outcomes in cell reprogramming and spermatogenesis with validated datasets. It is worth noting that, with a transfer learning framework, CellPolaris can perform GRN based predictions in all cell types even across species. Together, CellPolaris represents a significant advancement in deciphering the mechanisms of cell fate regulation, thereby enhancing the precision and efficiency of cell fate manipulation at high resolution.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.