Natural selection drives emergent genetic homogeneity in a century-scale experiment with barley
Landis, J. B.; Guercio, A. M.; Brown, K. E.; Fiscus, C. J.; Morrell, P. L.; Koenig, D.
Show abstract
Direct observation is central to our understanding of the process of adaptation, but evolution is rarely documented in a large, multicellular organism for more than a few generations. Here, we observe genetic and phenotypic evolution across a century-scale competition experiment, barley composite cross II (CCII). CCII was founded in 1929 with tens of thousands of unique genotypes and has been adapted to local conditions in Davis, CA, USA for 58 generations. We find that natural selection has massively reduced genetic diversity leading to a single clonal lineage constituting most of the population by generation F50. Selection favored alleles originating from similar climates to that of Davis, and targeted genes regulating reproductive development, including some of the most well-characterized barley diversification loci, Vrs1, HvCEN, and Ppd-H1. We chronicle the dynamic evolution of reproductive timing in the population and uncover how parallel molecular pathways are targeted by stabilizing selection to optimize this trait. Our findings point to selection as the predominant force shaping genomic variation in one of the worlds oldest ongoing biological experiments. One-Sentence SummaryWholesale genetic restructuring of an experimental population is a consequence of rapid environmental adaptation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic basis of parallel adaptation varies with divergence in Arabidopsis and its relatives 96%
- The Avocado Genome Informs Deep Angiosperm Phylogeny, Highlights Introgressive Hybridization, and Reveals Pathogen Influenced Gene Space Adaptation 96%
- Standing genetic variation and chromosome differences drove rapid ecotype formation in a major malaria vector 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.