Back

Dopamine and schizophrenia from bench to bedside: Discovery of a striatal co-expression risk gene set that predicts in vivo measures of striatal function.

Sportelli, L.; Eisenberg, D. P.; Passiatore, R.; D'Ambrosio, E.; Antonucci, L. A.; Chen, Q.; Czarapata, J.; Goldman, A. L.; Gregory, M.; Griffiths, K.; Hyde, T. M.; Kleinman, J. E.; Pardinas, A. F.; Parihar, M.; Popolizio, T.; Rampino, A.; Shin, J. H.; Veronese, M.; Ulrich, W. S.; Zink, C. F.; Bertolino, A.; Howes, O. D.; Berman, K. F.; Weinberger, D.; Pergola, G.

2023-09-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.09.20.558594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is characterized by a polygenic risk architecture implicating diverse molecular pathways important for synaptic function. However, how polygenic risk funnels through these pathways to translate into syndromic illness is unanswered. To evaluate biologically meaningful pathways of risk, we used tensor decomposition to characterize gene co-expression in post-mortem brain (of neurotypicals: N=154; patients with SCZ: N=84; and GTEX samples N=120) from caudate nucleus (CN), hippocampus (HP), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We identified a CN-predominant gene set showing dopaminergic selectivity that was enriched for genes associated with clinical state and for genes associated with SCZ risk. Parsing polygenic risk score for SCZ based on this specific gene set (parsed-PRS), we found that greater pathway-specific SCZ risk predicted greater in vivo striatal dopamine synthesis capacity measured by [18F]-FDOPA PET in three independent cohorts of neurotypicals and patients (total N=235) and greater fMRI striatal activation during reward anticipation in two additional independent neurotypical cohorts (total N=141). These results reveal a bench to bedside translation of dopamine-linked genetic risk variation in driving in vivo striatal neurochemical and hemodynamic phenotypes that have long been implicated in the pathophysiology of SCZ.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.