Where the present gets remembered: Sensory regions communicate with the brain over the longest timescales.
Cooper, G. J.; Blackburne, G.; Dekker, T. M.; Das, R. K.; Skipper, J. I.
Show abstract
In natural contexts, the brain simultaneously processes sensory information over diverse timescales. Here we reveal how this is reflected in the organisation of asynchronous connectivity in the brain. In 86 individuals watching feature-length movies during functional neuroimaging, we calculated the delay at peak connectivity between brain regions. We found the longest delays in received whole-brain functional connectivity within sensory regions (:S 18 seconds). Two complementary dimensionality reduction approaches were used to probe the spatial organisation of connection delays and weights. First, clustering of received delays separated sensory, and transmodal/associative outputting regions, suggesting that putatively localised functions are associated with asynchronous local-to-whole-brain connectivity patterns. Next, we organised delayed connectivity maps by likeness, unveiling five orthogonal gradients of variation, each demonstrating associations between early-sensory and transmodal/associative regions. Together, these findings challenge contemporary conceptualisations of the brains temporal hierarchy by emphasising the role of sensory regions as sites of integration across timescales.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic and phylogenetic uncoupling of structure and function in human transmodal cortex 98%
- Evolutionarily conserved fMRI network dynamics in the mouse, macaque, and human brain 97%
- Myelination and excitation-inhibition balance synergistically shape structure-function coupling across the human cortex 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.