Back

From overconfidence to task dropout in a spatial navigation test: evidence for the Dunning-Kruger effect across 46 countries

Walkowiak, S.; Coutrot, A.; Wiener, J. M.; Hornberger, M.; Manley, E.; Spiers, H. J.

2023-09-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.09.18.558324 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Overconfidence and the Dunning-Kruger effect have been reported in many cognitive domains. However, there is little examination in the field of spatial navigation. Here, we examined overconfidence in navigation ability in 376,836 participants from 46 countries. We tested navigation using our virtual wayfinding task in the app-based video game Sea Hero Quest, examined self-ratings of navigation ability and how many game levels participants had played before they dropped out. The main goal of this analysis was to investigate how performance of overconfident participants influenced the dropout rate from our experimental task embedded in a video game. First, we measured and modelled overestimation at baseline game levels. Age was found to be the strongest predictor of overestimation across the entire sample. Higher age was associated with increased overconfidence in all 46 countries and 11 distinct cultural clusters. Female participants were more likely to overestimate their performance across most of the life course (19-59 years old), however older men (60-70 years old) displayed highest overconfidence amongst all age-gender groups. Overconfidence also varied widely across countries. Secondly, we estimated performance on follow-up game levels for those who were previously identified as overconfident and we found that those who were more likely to display the Dunning-Kruger effect (i.e., poor performance while being overconfident) were predominantly female and older participants. Finally, survival analysis methods with time-dependent covariates revealed that poor wayfinding performance, while being overconfident, was one of the strongest predictors of task dropout. This Dunning-Kruger bias on participants dropout existed universally across all countries in our data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
7
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.8%
10
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%