Sex-specific differences in physiological parameters related to SARS-CoV-2 infections among a national cohort (COVI-GAPP study)
Grossmann, K.; Risch, M.; Markovic, A.; Aeschbacher, S.; Weideli, O. C.; Velez, L.; Kovac, M.; Pereira, F.; Wohlwend, N.; Risch, C.; Hillmann, D.; Lung, T.; Renz, H.; Twerenbold, R.; Rotenbühler, M.; Leibovitz, D.; Kovacevic, V.; Klaver, P.; Brakenhoff, T. B.; Franks, B.; Mitratza, M.; Downward, G. S.; Dowling, A.; Montes, S.; Grobbee, D. E.; Cronin, M.; Conen, D.; Goodale, B. M.; Risch, L.; COVID-RED consortium,
Show abstract
Considering sex as a biological variable in modern digital health solutions, we investigated sex-specific differences in the trajectory of four physiological parameters across a COVID-19 infection. A wearable medical device measured breathing rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, and wrist skin temperature in 1163 participants (mean age = 44.1 years, standard deviation [SD]=5.6; 667 [57%] females). Participants reported daily symptoms and confounders in a complementary app. A machine learning algorithm retrospectively ingested daily biophysical parameters to detect COVID-19 infections. COVID-19 serology samples were collected from all participants at baseline and follow-up. We analysed potential sex-specific differences in physiology and antibody titres using multilevel modelling and t-tests. Over 1.5 million hours of physiological data were recorded. During the symptomatic period of infection, men demonstrated larger increases in skin temperature, breathing rate and heart rate as well as larger decreases in heart rate variability than women. The COVID-19 infection detection algorithm performed similarly well for men and women. Our study belongs to the first research to provide evidence for differential physiological responses to COVID-19 between females and males, highlighting the potential of wearable technology to inform future precision medicine approaches. This work has received support from the Princely House of the Principality of Liechtenstein, the government of the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Hanela Foundation in Switzerland, and the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 101005177. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory physiological measures obtained under naturalistic urban mobility conditions have acceptable reliability 95%
- Chronicling menstrual cycle patterns across the reproductive lifespan with real world data 94%
- Effects of Electrocardiograms QRS Detection Algorithms in Heart Rate Variability Metrics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 93%
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 92%
- Population Analysis Of Mortality Risk: Predictive Models Using Motion Sensors For 100,000 Participants In The UK Biobank National Cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 91%
- Diagnostic Efficacy of Rapid Antigen Testing for SARS-CoV-2: The COVid-19 AntiGen (COVAG) study 91%
- Performance of a point of care test for detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and seroprevalence in blood donors and health care workers in Panama 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of wearable and clinical devices for acquisition of peripheral nervous system signals 93%
- Measuring Repositioning in Home Care for Pressure Injury Prevention and Management 92%
- Feasibility of Ultra-Short Term Analysis of Heart Rate and Systolic Arterial Pressure Variability at Rest and During Stress via Time-domain and Entropy-based Measures 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.