Biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making: An event-related potential study
Oguz, O. C.; Aydin, B.; Urgen, B. A.
Show abstract
Biological motion perception plays a critical role in various decisions in daily life for humans. Failure to decide accordingly in such a perceptual task could have life-threatening consequences. Neurophysiological studies on non-human primates and computational modeling studies suggest two processes that mediate perceptual decision-making. One of these signals is associated with the accumulation of sensory evidence and the other with response selection. Recent EEG studies with human participants have introduced an event-related potential called Centroparietal Positive Potential (CPP) as a neural marker aligned with the sensory evidence accumulation while effectively distinguishing it from motor-related event-related potential, namely lateralized readiness potential (LRP). The present study aims to investigate the neural mechanisms of biological motion perception in the theoretical framework of perceptual decision-making, which has been overlooked before. More specifically, we examine whether CPP would track the coherence of the biological motion stimuli and could be distinguished from the LRP signal. We recorded EEG from human participants while they were engaged in a direction discrimination task of a point-light walker whose coherence was manipulated by embedding it in various levels of noise. Our behavioral findings revealed shorter reaction times and reduced miss rates as the coherence of the target stimuli increased. In addition, CPP tracked the coherence of the biological motion stimuli with a tendency to reach a common level during the response, albeit with a later onset than the previously reported results in random-dot motion paradigms. Furthermore, CPP was distinguished from the LRP signal based on its temporal profile. Overall, our results suggest that the mechanisms underlying perceptual decision-making generalize to more complex and socially significant stimuli like biological motion. We discuss the implications of these findings for advancing computational models of biological motion perception and perceptual decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Early and late evoked brain responsesdifferentially reflect feature encoding andperception in the flash-lag illusion 97%
- Characterization of neural communication dynamics in the Ventral Attention Network across distinct spatial and spatio-temporal scales 97%
- Subjective time is predicted by local and early visual processing 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human Brain Dynamics Dissociate Early Perceptual and Late Motor-Related Stages of Affordance Processing 97%
- Alteration of brain dynamics during natural dual-task walking 97%
- To See, Not to See, or to See Poorly: Perceptual Quality and Guess Rate as a Function of Electroencephalography (EEG) Brain Activity in an Orientation Perception Task 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Synchronization between keyboard typing and neural oscillations 96%
- On the neuronal dynamics of aesthetic experience: Evidence from electroencephalographic oscillatory dynamics 96%
- Spatial contextual information modulates affordance processing and early electrophysiological markers of scene perception 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.