Protocol and rationale for the International PANS Registry (IPR; pediatric acute onset neuropsychiatric syndrome)
Masterson, E. E.; Gavin, J.
Show abstract
The International PANS Registry (IPR) is the first centralized, epidemiologic database of children with Pediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) and PANS-like features and their siblings. PANS is a relatively new umbrella syndrome that lacks diagnostic biomarkers and is characterized by a set of working criteria. The failure to find a diagnostic biomarker is likely due to underpowered studies and inherent biological heterogeneity within PANS. Until the IPR was established, a critical barrier to large-scale longitudinal studies had been the absence of a large-scale epidemiologic study and a centralized database of children with PANS and PANS-like features. The IPR was created to serve as a translational health tool to accelerate research on the broad spectrum of complex pediatric neuroimmune conditions with the long-term goal of enabling a paradigm shift in this field from symptom-based evaluation and treatment towards biology-based diagnoses, treatments, screening, and surveillance. To date, the IPR has registered 1,666 families (3,247 children) and is the largest database in the world that gathers in-depth information on children with PANS and PANS-like features and their siblings. Enrollment in the IPR is open and ongoing; longitudinal follow up is planned. Participating families enroll their children with PANS and PANS-like features and their healthy siblings in the IPR via an online survey platform. The selection criteria for IPR enrollment are intentionally less restrictive than the current working criteria for PANS to generate a large recruitment pool and enable study of the broad spectrum of PANS-like conditions. The IPR is designed to enable ancillary study recruitment based on detailed selection criteria and to grow and expand in scope in the future. The IPR team is committed to data sharing and invites collaborators who will leverage existing data from the IPR database and extend knowledge in an area beyond the original scope of the IPR.
Matching journals
The top 20 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) pediatric study protocol: Rationale, objectives and design 93%
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 90%
- Polygenic risk scores for asthma and allergic disease associate with COVID-19 severity in 9/11 responders 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural racism and COVID-19 response: Higher risk of exposure drives disparate COVID-19 deaths among Black and Hispanic/Latinx residents of Illinois, USA 86%
- Estimates of the Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 86%
- Sociodemographic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 serosurveillance studies with diverse recruitment strategies, Canada, 2020 to 2023 85%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes of 55,270 children and adolescents diagnosed with COVID-19 and 1,952,693 with influenza in France, Germany, Spain, South Korea and the United States: an international network cohort study 88%
- Serology in Children with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 87%
- Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spinocerebellar ataxia type 4 is caused by a GGC expansion in the ZFHX3 gene and is associated with prominent dysautonomia and motor neuron signs 88%
- Short-term Neuropsychiatric Outcomes and Quality of Life in COVID-19 Survivors 87%
- Research Letter: Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among unvaccinated US adults during the Omicron wave 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.