Partitioning heritability using single-cell multi-omics identifies a novel macrophage subpopulation conveying genetic risks of coronary artery disease.
Jiang, J.; Hiron, T. K.; Agbaedeng, T.; Malhotra, Y.; Drydale, E. N.; Bancroft, J.; Ng, E.; Reschen, M.; Davison, L. J.; O'Callaghan, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD), the leading cause of death worldwide, is influenced by both environmental and genetic factors. While over 250 genetic risk loci have been identified through genome-wide association studies, the specific causal variants and their regulatory mechanisms are still largely unknown, particularly in disease-relevant cell types like macrophages. MethodsWe utilized single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) and single-cell multi-omics approaches in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages to explore the transcriptional regulatory network involved in a critical pathogenic event of coronary atherosclerosis--the formation of lipid-laden foam cells. Meta-analysis of scRNA-seq datasets from 26 human plaque samples was undertaken to provide a comprehensive atlas of lesional macrophages and to correlate subpopulations in vivo and ex vivo. The genetic risk levels of CAD were assessed by partitioning disease heritability across different macrophage subpopulations. ResultsWe identified a novel macrophage subpopulation, termed lipid-handling macrophages, both ex vivo and in vivo, and identified associated marker genes, transcription regulators, and functional pathways. 18,782 cis-regulatory elements were identified by jointly profiling the gene expression and chromatin accessibility of >5000 macrophages. Integration with CAD GWAS data prioritized 121 CAD-related genetic variants and 56 candidate causal genes. We showed that CAD heritability was not uniformly distributed and was particularly enriched in the gene programs of lipid-handling macrophages. We investigated the cis-regulatory effect of a risk variant rs10488763 on FDX1, implicating the recruitment of AP-1 and C/EBP-beta in the causal mechanisms at this locus. ConclusionsOur results provide genetic evidence of the divergent roles of macrophage subsets in atherogenesis and highlight lipid-handling macrophages as a key sub-population through which genetic variants actively influence disease. These findings provide an unbiased framework for functional fine-mapping of GWAS results using single-cell multi-omics and offer new insights into the genotype-environment interactions underlying atherosclerotic disease.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of cell-type and context-dependent regulatory variants on human immune traits 94%
- Quantitative trait loci mapped for TCF21 binding, chromatin accessibility and chromosomal looping in coronary artery smooth muscle cells reveal molecular mechanisms of coronary disease loci 93%
- An atlas of genetic regulation and disease associations of microRNAs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CRISPR perturbations at many coronary artery disease loci impair vascular endothelial cell functions 93%
- MOSTWAS: Multi-Omic Strategies for Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies 92%
- A Statistical Framework to Identify Cell Types Whose Genetically Regulated Proportions are Associated with Complex Diseases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- TWIST1 drives endothelial-to-mesenchymal-transition to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques 94%
- Genome-wide association analysis of plasma lipidome identifies 495 genetic associations 94%
- Loss of embryonically-derived Kupffer cells during hypercholesterolemia accelerates atherosclerosis development 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A loss-of-function CCR2 variant is associated with lower cardiovascular risk 94%
- Integration of functional genomics and statistical fine-mapping systematically characterizes adult-onset and childhood-onset asthma genetic associations 93%
- Leveraging genomic diversity for discovery in an EHR-linked biobank: the UCLA ATLAS Community Health Initiative 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.