Back

Enhanced neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 XBB sub-lineages and BA.2.86 by a tetravalent COVID-19 vaccine booster

Wang, X.; Jiang, S.; Ma, W.; Li, X.; Wei, K.; Xie, F.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, C.; Qiao, R.; Cui, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Cai, G.; Liu, C.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, P.

2023-09-15 immunology
10.1101/2023.09.14.557682 bioRxiv
Show abstract

As the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve, novel XBB sub-lineages such as XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, EG.5, HK.3 (FLip), and XBB.2.3, as well as the most recent BA.2.86, have been identified and aroused global concern. Understanding the efficacy of current vaccines and the immune systems response to these emerging variants is critical for global public health. In this study, we evaluated the neutralization activities of sera from participants who received COVID-19 inactivated vaccines, or a booster vaccination of the recently approved tetravalent protein vaccine in China (SCTV01E), or had contracted a breakthrough infection with BA.5/BF.7/XBB virus. Comparative analysis of their neutralization profiles against a broad panel of 30 SARS-CoV-2 sub-lineage viruses revealed that strains such as BQ.1.1, CH.1.1, and all the XBB sub-lineages exhibited heightened resistance to neutralization than previous variants, however, despite the extra mutations carried by emerging XBB sub-lineages and BA.2.86, they did not demonstrate significantly increased resistance to neutralization compared to XBB.1.5. Encouragingly, the SCTV01E booster vaccination consistently induced robust and considerably higher neutralizing titers against all these variants than breakthrough infection did. Cellular immunity assays also showed that the SCTV01E booster vaccination elicited a higher frequency of virus-specific memory B cells but not IFN-{gamma} secreting T cells. Our findings underline the importance of developing novel multivalent vaccines to more effectively combat future viral variants.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.