Back

Choice of Ultrafilter affects Recovery Rate of Bacteriophages

Larsen, F.; Offersen, S. M.; Li, V. R.; Deng, L.; Nielsen, D. S.; Rasmussen, T. S.

2023-09-14 microbiology
10.1101/2023.09.14.557126 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Studies into the viral fraction of complex microbial communities like in the mammalian gut have recently garnered much interest. Yet there is still no standardized protocol for extracting viruses from such samples, and the protocols that exist employ procedures that skew the viral community of the sample one way or another. The first step of the extraction pipeline often consists of basic filtering of macromolecules and bacteria, yet even this affects the viruses in a strain-specific manner. In this study we investigate a protocol for viral extraction based on ultrafiltration and6 how the choice of ultrafilter might influence the viral community. Clinical samples (feces, vaginal7 swabs, and tracheal suction samples) were spiked with a mock community of known phages (T4,8 c2, {Phi}6, {Phi}29, {Phi}x174, and {Phi}2972), filtered, and quantified by spot and plaque assays to estimate the9 loss in recovery. Especially the enveloped {Phi}6 phage is severely affected by choice of filter, but also10 tailed phages such as T4 and c2 have a reduced infectivity after ultrafiltration. We conclude that11 the pore size of ultrafilters may affect the recovery of phages in a strain- and sample dependent12 manner, suggesting the need for greater thought when selecting filters for virus extraction.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.