The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on short-term cancer survival in the United Kingdom: a cohort analysis
Barclay, N. L.; Burkard, T.; Burn, E.; Delmestri, A.; Dominguez, A. M.; Golozar, A.; Guarner-Argente, C.; Aviles-Jurado, F.-X.; Man, W. Y.; Rosello Serrano, A.; Weinberger Rosen, A.; Tan, E. H.; Tietzova, I.; OPTIMA Consortium, ; PRIETO-ALHAMBRA, D.; Newby, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected healthcare systems and patients. There is a pressing need to comprehend the collateral effects of the pandemic on noncommunicable diseases. Here we examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shortterm cancer survival in the United Kingdom (UK). We hypothesised that short-term survival from nine cancers would be reduced during the pandemic, particularly cancers that benefit from screening and early detection (e.g., breast and colorectal cancer). DesignPopulation-based cohort study. SettingElectronic health records from UK primary care Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database. ParticipantsThere were 12,259,744 eligible patients aged [≥]18 years with [≥]one year of prior history identified from January 2000 to December 2021. Main outcome measuresWe estimated age-standardised incidence rates (IR) and short-term (one- and two-year) survival of several common cancers (breast, colorectal, head and neck, liver, lung, oesophagus, pancreatic, prostate, and stomach cancer) from 2000 to 2019 (in five-year strata) compared to 2020 to 2021 using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsApart from pancreatic cancer, IRs decreased for all cancers in 2020 and recovered to different extents in 2021. Short-term survival improved for most cancers between 2000 to 2019, but then declined for those diagnosed in 2020 to 2021.This was most pronounced for colorectal cancer, with one-year survival falling from 79.3% [95% confidence interval: 78.5%-80.1%] in 2015 to 2019 to 76.3% [74.6%-78.1%] for those diagnosed in 2020 to 2021. ConclusionShort-term survival for many cancers was impacted by the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. This decline was most prominent for colorectal cancer, with reductions in survivorship equivalent to returning to mortality seen in the first decade of the 2000s. These results illustrate the need for an immediate and well-funded investment in resolving the current backlog in cancer screening and diagnostic procedures in the UK National Health Service to improve patient outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 96%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 93%
- Distinct temporal trends in breast cancer incidence from 1997 to 2016 by molecular subtypes: A population-based study of Scottish cancer registry data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 96%
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 95%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 95%
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 92%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 94%
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 92%
- Epidemiology and excess mortality of antimicrobial resistance in bacteraemias among cancer patients: a cohort study using routinely collected health data from regional hospital trusts in Oxford and Oslo, 2008-2018 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results to identify patients with symptoms at risk of colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients tested in primary care 92%
- Risk of cancer in regular and low meat-eaters, fish-eaters, and vegetarians: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants 91%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality in the second and third waves of the pandemic in England during the vaccine roll-out: a retrospective, population-based cohort study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.