Back

Removal of Free Liquid Layer from Liquid-Infused Catheters Reduces Silicone Loss into the Environment while Maintaining Adhesion Resistance

Fong, C. K.; Andersen, M. J.; Kunesh, E.; Leonard, E.; Durand, D.; Coombs, R.; Flores-Mireles, A. L.; Howell, C.

2023-09-19 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2023.09.14.23295548 medRxiv
Show abstract

Silicone urinary catheters infused with silicone liquid offer an effective alternative to antibiotic coatings, reducing microbial adhesion while decreasing bladder colonization and systemic dissemination. However, loss of free silicone liquid from the surface into the host system is undesirable. To reduce the potential for liquid loss, free silicone liquid was removed from the surface of liquid-infused catheters by either removing excess liquid from fully infused samples or by partial infusion. The effect on bacterial and host protein adhesion was then assessed. Removing the free liquid from fully infused samples resulted in a [~]64% decrease in liquid loss into the environment compared to controls, with no significant increase in deposition of the host protein fibrinogen or the adhesion of the common uropathogen Enterococcus faecalis. Partially infusing samples decreased liquid loss as total liquid content decreased, with samples infused to 70-80% of their maximum capacity showing a [~]85% reduction in liquid loss compared to fully infused controls. Furthermore, samples above 70% infusion showed no significant increase in fibrinogen or E. faecalis adhesion. Together, the results suggest that eliminating free liquid layer, mechanically or through partial infusion, can reduce liquid loss from liquid-infused catheters while preserving functionality. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=37 SRC="FIGDIR/small/23295548v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (13K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d75541org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e2165org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@22ad8corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@afd1c8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.