Back

How COVID-19 continues to affect contraception in Scotland: a retrospective analysis of Scottish prescribing data between 2016 and 2023.

Johnson-Hall, E.

2023-09-14 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2023.09.14.23295542 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn Scotland, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on womens access to contraception are unknown. Globally, COVID-19 restrictions have led to a shift to telehealth service delivery alongside a reduction in contraceptive provision. Research into whether the effects of COVID-19 on contraception have abated after restrictions have been lifted is lacking. MethodsThis is a retrospective longitudinal study of prescribing data from the Scottish Health and Social Care Open Data repository (https://www.opendata.nhs.scot) between January 2016 and January 2023. Contraceptives were extracted and categorised using truncated British National Formulary codes and analysed using R. Contraceptive provision was compared across four periods: pre-COVID-19 (01/01/2016-23/03/2020), lockdown (24/03/2020-29/05/2020 & 05/01/2021-26/04/2021), restrictions (30/05/2020-04/01/2021 & 27/04/2021-30/04/2022), and post-COVID-19 (01/05/2022-01/01/2023). ResultsDuring lockdowns, contraceptive prescribing in Scotland decreased by 82.90% of pre-COVID-19 levels. This trend was more severe for long-acting reversible contraception which fell to 11.80% of pre-COVID-19 prescriptions. After COVID-19, the level of contraceptive prescribing has risen to 108.23% of its pre-pandemic level. Large increases in subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (499.05%), progestogen-only pills (125.07%), the patch (165.09%), levonorgestrel-IUS (112.54%), and ulipristal acetate emergency contraception prescribing (357.97%). Conversely, combined oral contraceptive pills (75.04%), Cu-IUD (83.63%), the implant (81.10%), and levonorgestrel emergency contraception (67.42%) prescribing has decreased. ConclusionsCOVID-19 vastly decreased contraceptive prescribing during lockdowns in Scotland. Post-COVID-19, changes in contraceptive prescribing within Scottish general practices are reported, with implications for health policy and service delivery planning. Availability of Data & CodeAll code and data used are fully available from Zenodo (doi:10.5281/zenodo.8310085) The raw dataset used is also publicly available from the Scottish Health and Social Care Open Data repository (opendata.nhs.scot).

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.4%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
11.5%
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
British Journal of General Practice
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
10
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Journal of the International AIDS Society
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 81%
0.5%
25
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%