Flexibility of tandem leaders resolves traffic jams during colony relocation in an ant
Pathak, M. K.; Annagiri, S.
Show abstract
Efficient traffic flow underpins biological and engineered systems. Ants, widely regarded as exemplars of collective efficiency in active matter research. We examined ants for traffic dynamics and transport efficiency during nest relocation via tandem running, that affects colony survival. Laboratory experiments, inspired by their monsoon-constrained habitats, and agent-based modeling reveal that narrow paths trigger jams 18 times more frequently than multi-lane paths, primarily driven by returning leaders (59%), followed by brood transporters (27%) and lost followers (14%). Despite a 1.3-fold transport delay, returning leaders mitigate jams through adaptive U-turns and midway recruitment, generating emergent unidirectional flow. This aligns with active matter principles of self-propelled agents navigating non-equilibrium dynamics. These findings reveal traffic jams in tandem-running ants, challenging assumptions of jam-free ant traffic, and inspire algorithms for robotic swarms and traffic optimization. The study contributes to understanding non-reciprocal interactions and emergent phenomena in biological systems.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Visual social information use in collective foraging 95%
- Computational and robotic modeling reveal parsimonious combinations of interactions between individuals in schooling fish 95%
- Ant visual route navigation: How the fine details of behaviour promote successful route performance and convergence 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leaderless consensus decision-making determines cooperative transport direction in weaver ants 95%
- Olfactory performance explains duality of antennal architectural designs in Lepidoptera 94%
- The wisdom of stalemates: consensus and clustering as filtering mechanisms for improving collective accuracy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.