Back

Computational Assessment of Aromatase: Unmasking Therapeutic Avenues for Female Hormonal Disorders

Pokharel, A.; Aryal, P.; Subedi, S.; Koirala, S. P.; Magar, B. S.; Yadav, A. K.; Regmi, A.

2023-09-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.09.13.557603 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Women of reproductive age widely experience the physical, mental, and emotional effects of hormonal imbalances. The levels of two hormones, estrogen, and progesterone, were particularly high. When these two hormones are unbalanced, symptoms such as irregular menstrual cycles, pelvic pain, and uterine fibroids can appear. Statistics show that 80 percent of women have hormonal imbalances. The creation of novel disease-containing drug candidates may be facilitated by computer-aided drug design (CADD), as many drugs and surgical treatments have unique adverse effects. Achieving good data coverage requires an optimized process for protein identification and enhanced selection techniques for medicinal compounds, including their metabolic characterization. In this study, aromatase is the prioritized protein that acted as a rate-limiting enzyme in steroidogenesis. To maintain its expression and regulation to control estrogen production, natural compounds were retrieved from the ZINC15 database through ADME/TOX property filtration. Compound B, specifically designated as (1R,3S,6S,7S,10S,11R)-7-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-3,12-dimethyl-2,9-dioxatetracyclo [9.3.0.01,3.06,10] tetradec-12-en-8-one, exhibits remarkable therapeutic potential, as evidenced by its inability to inhibit S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) biosynthesis, the observed stability of molecular interactions based on Density Functional Theory (DFT), and a favorable energy gap between molecular orbital stages. This research can be employed as a utility module for fast screening of drug-like molecules and taking these leads forward to clinical trials, assessing their value as potential suitors for drug repurposing against female hormonal disorders.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.