Back

The discriminative ability of ROTEM for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Poor Outcome following Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

Tjerkstra, M. A.; Labib, H.; Post, R.; Coert, B. A.; Vandertop, W. P.; Verbaan, D.; Juffermans, N. P.

2023-09-12 neurology
10.1101/2023.09.11.23295389 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) have been associated with hypercoagulability as detected by viscoelastic testing. In this study, we evaluate temporal alterations in rotational thromboelastography (ROTEM-) coagulation profiles and the discriminative ability of ROTEM-parameters for DCI and poor clinical outcome following aSAH. Materials and MethodsROTEM-parameters were measured on days 0, 3-5 and 9-11 after aSAH and compared between patients with and without DCI, radiological DCI and 6-months poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 4-6). ROC-curve analyses were used to calculate areas-under-the-curve (AUC) and to determine optimal cut-off values with a sensitivity of >90% and highest possible specificity for DCI and radiological DCI. For poor outcome, a specificity >90% with highest possible sensitivity was used. ResultsOf 160 aSAH patients, 31 (19%) had DCI, 16 (10%) radiological DCI and 68 (44%) had poor outcome at six months. DCI, radiological DCI and poor clinical outcome were associated with hypercoagulability. The ROTEM-parameter with the best discriminative ability for radiological DCI was INTEM CT (AUC: 0.75), with optimal cut-off value <153 seconds (sensitivity 94%, specificity 59%). For poor outcome, this was FIBTEM A10, (AUC: 0.85), with optimal cut-off value >27 mm (specificity 94%, sensitivity 49%). ConclusionsHypercoagulability, as detected by ROTEM-parameters, is an excellent marker of poor clinical outcome after aSAH and might be useful for stratifying patients for inclusion in future trials on therapeutic interventions. Conversely, the absence of hypercoagulability on ROTEM may be used to identify patients at low risk of DCI for early hospital discharge.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
7
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
10
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
15
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
16
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
24
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%