Back

A scoping review of the unmet needs of patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

Bramhill, C. R.; Mulryan, H.; Langan, D.; Eustace-Cook, J.; Russell, A.-M.; Brady, A.-M.

2023-09-12 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.09.11.23294619 medRxiv
Show abstract

TitleA scoping review of the unmet needs of patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). AimsPatients diagnosed with IPF have a high symptom burden and numerous needs that remain largely unaddressed despite advances in available treatment options. There is a need to comprehensively identify patients needs and create opportunities to address them. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the available evidence and identify gaps in the literature regarding the unmet needs of patients diagnosed with IPF. MethodsThe protocol for the review was registered with Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/SY4KM). A systematic search was performed in March 2022, in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsyhcoInfo, Web of Science Core Collection and ASSIA Applied Social Science Index. A comprehensive review of grey literature was also completed. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with IPF or PF; English language only and date range 2011-2022. A range of review types were included. Data was extracted using a data extraction form. Data was analysed using descriptive and thematic analysis. A total of 884 citations were reviewed. Ethical approval was not required. Results52 citations were selected for final inclusion. Five themes were identified: psychological impact of an IPF diagnosis; adequate information and education: at the right time and in the right way; high symptom burden support needs; referral to palliative care and advanced care planning (ACP) and health service provision-a systems approach. ConclusionThis review highlights the myriad of needs patients with IPF have and highlights the urgent need for a systems approach to care, underpinned by an appropriately resourced multi-disciplinary team. The range of needs experienced by patients with IPF are broad and varied and require a holistic approach to care including targeted research, coupled with the continuing development of patient-focused services and development of a clinical care programme.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
6
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
7
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
15
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%