A biobank-scale test of marginal epistasis reveals genome-wide signals of polygenic epistasis
Fu, B.; Pazokitoroudi, A.; Xue, A.; Anand, A.; Anand, P.; Zaitlen, N.; Sankararaman, S.
Show abstract
The contribution of epistasis (interactions among genes or genetic variants) to human complex trait variation remains poorly understood. Methods that aim to explicitly identify pairs of genetic variants, usually single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with a trait suffer from low power due to the large number of hypotheses tested while also having to deal with the computational problem of searching over a potentially large number of candidate pairs. An alternate approach involves testing whether a single SNP modulates variation in a trait against a polygenic background. While overcoming the limitation of low power, such tests of polygenic or marginal epistasis (ME) are infeasible on Biobank-scale data where hundreds of thousands of individuals are genotyped over millions of SNPs. We present a method to test for ME of a SNP on a trait that is applicable to biobank-scale data. We performed extensive simulations to show that our method provides calibrated tests of ME. We applied our method to test for ME at SNPs that are associated with 53 quantitative traits across {approx} 300 K unrelated white British individuals in the UK Biobank (UKBB). Testing 15, 601 trait-loci associations that were significant in GWAS, we identified 16 trait-loci pairs across 12 traits that demonstrate strong evidence of ME signals (p-value [Formula]). We further partitioned the significant ME signals across the genome to identify 6 trait-loci pairs with evidence of local (within-chromosome) ME while 15 show evidence of distal (cross-chromosome) ME. Across the 16 trait-loci pairs, we document that the proportion of trait variance explained by ME is about 12x as large as that explained by the GWAS effects on average (range: 0.59 to 43.89). Our results show, for the first time, evidence of interaction effects between individual genetic variants and overall polygenic background modulating complex trait variation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SparsePro: an efficient fine-mapping method integrating summary statistics and functional annotations 97%
- Scalable probabilistic PCA for large-scale genetic variation data 97%
- Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sparse modeling of interactions enables fast detection of genome-wide epistasis in biobank-scale studies 98%
- Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization 98%
- Fast and Accurate Bayesian Polygenic Risk Modeling with Variational Inference 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian randomization accounting for correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropic effects using genome-wide summary statistics. 98%
- Fast and flexible joint fine-mapping of multiple traits via the Sum of Single Effects model 97%
- LDAK-KVIK performs fast and powerful mixed-model association analysis of quantitative and binary phenotypes 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.