The McMaster Racialized Resident Mentorship Program Evaluation Protocol: Evaluating a racialized resident to racialized staff physician mentorship network on resident sense of belonging and medical training outcomes.
Menezes, A.; Arora, N.; Sobchak, C.; Semalulu, T.; Mercado, M.; McDonald, M.; Monteiro, S.; Archie, S.; Agarwal, G.; The DARe Group Collaborative,
Show abstract
The McMaster Racialized Resident Mentorship Program Evaluation will formally evaluate the effectiveness of a racialized resident mentorship network at increasing racialized residents sense of belonging to the medical training environment and reducing the racial attainment gap in medical careers. The program is composed of three phases. Phase 1 is an acceptability study of the collection of race0based data from all matriculating residents at McMaster University. Phases 2 and 3 will focus on family medicine residents. Phase 2 is a formal program evaluation of a mentorship network connecting matriculating racialized residents with racialized physician mentors, intended to run for 24 months and using repeat focus groups to explore the impacts of the program on residents sense of belonging. Phase 3 is a cross sectional study of graduating family medicine residents, examining associations between residents identities and attainment within residency training. The program evaluation will involve formal mentor training, a mentor Community of Practice, and mentor and resident focus groups examining experiences within the program and sense of belonging to the Department of Family Medicine and their training sites. The program process inputs will include: the number of faculty who attend mentor training, and the number of racialized faculty mentors and racialized residents who register for the program; attendance at the Community of Practice; and attendance at focus groups of mentors and residents. An exit survey will assess the number of residents who participated in the program, the duration of participation, expected graduation time, number of mentor meetings. Short term outcomes will be measured at the phase 1 survey and at program enrollment and include: resident awareness of racialized mentors, and sense of support and sense of belonging. Long-term outcomes for the program will be assessed in phase 3, examining associations between resident social identities (including race) and family medicine residency training outcomes. The project results will represent the first investigation of racial attainment in postgraduate medical training in Canada, with changes in residents sense of belonging and attainment during residency as indicators of Mentorship program effectiveness.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Health Professional Students at the University of Illinois Chicago (HOLISTIC) Cohort Study 94%
- Predictors of Burnout Among Academic Family Medicine Faculty: Looking Back to Plan forward 94%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 95%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 93%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 92%
- Community-Based Culturally Tailored Education Programs for Black Adults with Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, Hypertension, and Stroke: A Systematic Review Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Retrospective Case Study of Successful Translational Research: Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Experiences in Community Engagement 94%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 94%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 90%
- Sociodemographic predictors of outcomes in COVID-19: examining the impact of ethnic disparities in Northern Nevada 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.