Back

Effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in treatment of Heart failure: A Meta-Analysis

Albalushi, S.; Zarif, A.; Karaduman, S.; Tran, K.; Talpeka, A.

2023-09-11 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.09.10.23295313 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimWe conducted a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in heart failure (HF) patients with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. MethodsA comprehensive search of several databases for placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors from inception to September 30 2022, limited to English language and excluding animal studies, was conducted. The databases included Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised controlled studies were chosen if they included HF patients and reported at least one of the predetermined outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios were pooled together with the appropriate 95% confidence intervals using a random-effect model. Fourteen trials met the inclusion criteria, with 42 409 HF patients participating (N = 21 678 in the SGLT2 inhibitor arms and N = 20 731 in the placebo arms). ResultsSGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the composite of HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death [HR: 0.75 (0.71-0.79); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%], total hospitalisations for heart failure [HR: 0.70 (0.66- 0.75); P < 0.001; I2 = 0%], and reduced the occurrence of cardiovascular death [HR: 0.86 (0.81-0.92); P < 0.001; I2 = 43%]. Sub-group analysis was conducted based on HF status at baseline, EF, diabetes status at baseline, and sex. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the composite heart failure hospitalisation and cardiovascular death for all the subgroups except for patients with HFpEF at baseline [HR: 0.87 (0.74- 1.03); P = 0.11; I2 = 60%] and no diabetes status at baseline [HR: 0.92 (0.73-1.16); P = 0.50; I2 = 78%]. ConclusionsIn patients with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors may significantly improve clinical outcomes, including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. In this meta-analysis, SGLT2 inhibitors did not show a reduction in composite heart failure in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction at baseline.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.8%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
7
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
12
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%