A General Method to Accurately Count Molecular Complexes and Determine the Degree of Labelling in Cells Using Protein Tags
Tashev, S. A.; Euchner, J.; Yserentant, K.; Hänselmann, S.; Hild, F.; Chmielewicz, W.; Hummert, J.; Schwörer, F.; Tsopoulidis, N.; Germer, S.; Sassmannshausen, Z.; Fackler, O. T.; Klingmüller, U.; Herten, D.-P.
Show abstract
Determining the label to target ratio, also known as degree of labelling (DOL), is crucial for quantitative fluorescence microscopy and a high DOL with minimal unspecific labelling is beneficial for fluorescence microscopy in general. Yet, robust, versatile, and easy-to-use tools for measuring cell-specific labelling efficiencies are not available. This study presents a novel DOL determination technique named Protein-tag DOL (ProDOL), which enables fast DOL measurements and optimisation of protein-tag labelling. With ProDOL various factors affecting labelling efficiency, including substrate type, incubation time, and concentration, as well as sample fixation and cell type can be easily assessed. We applied ProDOL to investigate how HIV-1 pathogenesis factor Nef modulates CD4 T cell activation measuring total and activated copy numbers of the adaptor protein SLP-76 in signalling microclusters. ProDOL proved to be a versatile and robust tool for labelling calibration, enabling determination of labelling efficiencies, optimisation of strategies, and quantification of protein stoichiometry.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- FluoSim: simulator of single molecule dynamics for fluorescence live-cell and super-resolution imaging of membrane proteins 96%
- Vectashield-induced fluorescence quenching hinders conventional and super resolution microscopy 95%
- A minimal-complexity light-sheet microscope maps network activity in 3D neuronal systems 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.