Back

Polygenic Scores for Longitudinal Prediction of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in an Ancestrally and Medically Diverse Primary Care Network

Mandla, R.; Schroeder, P.; Porneala, B.; Florez, J. C.; Meigs, J. B.; Mercader, J. M.; Leong, A.

2023-09-10 endocrinology
10.1101/2023.09.08.23295276
Show abstract

OBJECTIVEThe clinical utility of genetic information for type 2 diabetes (T2D) prediction with polygenic score (PGS) in ancestrally diverse, real-world US healthcare systems is unclear, especially for those at low clinical phenotypic risk for T2D. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe tested the association of PGS with T2D incidence in patients followed within a primary care practice network over 16 years in four hypothetical scenarios that varied by clinical data availability (N = 14,712): 1) age and sex, 2) age, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and family history of diabetes; 3) all variables in (2) and random glucose; 4) all variables in (3), HDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, combined in a clinical risk score (CRS). To determine whether genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk, we tested for interaction with the CRS. RESULTSPGS was associated with incident diabetes in all models. Adjusting for age and sex only, the Hazard Ratio (HR) per PGS standard deviation (SD) was 1.76 (95% CI 1.68, 1.84) and the HR of top 5% of PGS vs interquartile range (IQR) was 2.80 (2.39, 3.28). Adjusting for the CRS, the HR per SD was 1.48 (1.40, 1.57) and HR of top 5% of PGS vs IQR was 2.09 (1.72, 2.55). Genetic effects differed by baseline clinical risk [(PGS-CRS interaction p=0.05; CRS below the median: HR 1.60 (1.43, 1.79); CRS above the median: HR 1.45 (1.35, 1.55)]. CONCLUSIONSGenetic information can help identify high-risk patients even among those perceived to be low risk in a clinical evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
15.9%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.6%
11.6%
3
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.3%
11.6%
4
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
based on 53 papers
Top 3%
3.1%
7
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
8
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
9
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 10%
2.5%
10
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
12
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 29%
1.8%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 4%
1.8%
15
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.8%
16
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 4%
1.6%
17
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 89%
1.6%
18
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
19
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
20
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 76%
1.4%
21
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 46%
1.2%
22
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Pediatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 5%
0.7%