Back

Advancing Drug Development with aiHumanoid Simulations: A Virtual Phase 1 Comparative Study of Standard Chemotherapy versus Standard Chemotherapy plus COTI-2 for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Danter, W. R.

2023-09-10 oncology
10.1101/2023.09.08.23295256
Show abstract

BackgroundTraditional Phase 1 trials often provide important drug development insights, which can be limited by ethical issues, costs, and lengthy timelines. Advancements in AI based simulations offer a potential avenue for mitigating these challenges. The present study used the aiHumanoid platform, specifically the upgraded DeepNEU database v8.1, to design and conduct a virtual Phase 1 trial, to assess the comparative efficacy and toxicity of standard chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus Taxol vs a combination of standard chemotherapy plus COTI-2 for treating Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (PAC). MethodsApplying the updated DeepNEU database of 7267 genotypic and phenotypic concepts linked through 67491 relationships, the study used aiHumanoid simulations to predict outcomes from 30 virtual patients. Data from the standard chemotherapy arm and the standard treatment plus COTI2 arm were analyzed at 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of maximal dose. Estimates of efficacy and potential toxicities were based on a combination of the paired 2 tailed T test and Cohens d values as a true estimate of treatment effects. ResultsThe novel combined treatment regimen, especially at 100% dosage, showed medium to large treatment effects on the entire Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma disease profile. Notably, a significant decrease was observed in all disease profile components, bolstered by p-values less than 8.68E-5 and Cohens d values >=0.335. While evidence hinted at an increased bone marrow toxicity in the novel treatment arm, no individual organoid toxicity exceeded one standard deviation above predicted values. Importantly, COTI-2 treatment demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in p53 levels, significant at p < 0.006. ConclusionThis aiHumanoids virtual Phase 1 trial emphasizes the potential of computational simulations in the drug development process. Our findings indicate a promising treatment pathway combining COTI-2 with standard chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Ongoing development and validation of the aiHumanoid based virtual Phase 1 clinical trial methodology is warranted.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
11.2%
2
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 24%
7.6%
5
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
6
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 67%
5.3%
7
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 5%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
9
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.9%
10
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
11
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
13
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 35%
1.3%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
16
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 45%
1.3%
17
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
18
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 12%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
23
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Radiotherapy and Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Computers in Biology and Medicine
based on 39 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PNAS Nexus
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
0.7%