Light at night and modeled circadian disruption predict higher risk of mortality: A prospective study in >88,000 participants
Windred, D. P.; Burns, A. C.; Lane, J. M.; Olivier, P.; Rutter, M. K.; Saxena, R.; Phillips, A. J. K.; Cain, S. W.
Show abstract
ImportanceLight at night disrupts human circadian rhythms, which are critical for maintaining optimal health. Circadian disruption accompanies poor health outcomes that precede premature mortality, including cardiometabolic diseases. However, links between personal night light exposure and premature mortality risk have not been established. ObjectiveTo characterize the association of light at night with all-cause and cardiometabolic mortality risks and to understand the role of circadian disruption in these associations by applying a computational model of the response of the human circadian pacemaker to light. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingUnited Kingdom. ParticipantsUK Biobank cohort, N=88,904, aged 62.4{+/-}7.8 years, 57% female. ExposureParticipants wore activity tracking watches with light sensors for one week between 2013-2016. Twenty-four-hour light exposure profiles were extracted for each participant, and day-time and night-time hours were defined by factor analysis. A validated mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker was applied to model circadian amplitude and phase from weekly light data. Main OutcomeCause-specific mortality (National Health Service) recorded in 2,605 participants across a mean ({+/-}SD) follow-up period of 6.31{+/-}0.83 years after light/activity tracking. ResultsRisk of all-cause mortality was higher in participants in the 90th-100th percentiles of night-light exposure (HR[95%CI]=1.30[1.15-1.48]), and for those between the 70th-90th percentiles (HR=1.16[1.04-1.28]), compared to the darkest 50%. Participants in the 90th-100th percentiles of night-light exposure also had higher risk of cardiometabolic mortality (HR=1.41[1.07-1.85]). Higher circadian amplitude predicted lower risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.94[0.91-0.97] per SD) and cardiometabolic mortality (HR=0.90[0.83-0.96]), and circadian phase that deviated from the group average predicted higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR=1.33[1.17-1.51]) and cardiometabolic mortality (HR=1.48[1.12-1.97]). These findings were robust to adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Conclusions and RelevanceMinimizing exposure to light at night and keeping regular light-dark patterns that enhance circadian rhythms may promote cardiometabolic health and longevity. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs light exposure at night associated with risk of premature mortality? FindingsExposure to brighter light at night, recorded with personal light sensors in >88,000 participants, was associated with higher risk of mortality across a subsequent 6-year period. Computational modeling indicated that disrupted circadian rhythms may explain this higher mortality risk. MeaningAvoiding light at night may be a cost-effective and accessible recommendation for promoting health and longevity.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Light of both high and low melanopic illuminance improves alertness and attention during daytime 93%
- Artificial light at night leads to circadian disruption in a songbird: integrated evidence from behavioural, genomic and metabolomic data 90%
- Development and Validation of a Metabolite Index for Obstructive Sleep Apnea across Race/Ethnicities 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring health in the UK Biobank: associations with sociodemographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, lifestyle and environmental exposures 93%
- The UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme and changes in diet, physical activity and sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from eight longitudinal studies 91%
- Unveiling the Epigenetic Impact of Vegan vs. Omnivorous Diets on Aging: Insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of working shifts, inside and outside of healthcare, with risk of severe COVID-19: An observational study 91%
- Dose-response associations of device measured sleep regularity and duration with incident dementia in 82391 UK adults 90%
- Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study to assess personal light exposure 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sleep Duration in the United States, 2004–2018 91%
- Estimating the Burden of Influenza on Daily Activity at Population Scale Using Commercial Wearable Sensors 90%
- Effects of exercise on brain health outcomes in children with overweight/obesity: the ActiveBrains randomized controlled trial 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.