Local field potentials in human motor and non-motor brain areas encode the direction of upcoming movements: An intracerebral EEG classification study
Combrisson, E.; Di Rienzo, F.; Saive, A.-l.; Perrone-Bertolotti, M.; Soto, J. L.; Kahane, P.; Lachaux, J.-P.; Guillot, A.; Jerbi, K.
Show abstract
Limb movement direction can be inferred from motor cortex activity. In humans, such decoding has been predominantly demonstrated using the spectral power of electrophysiological signals recorded in sensorimotor areas during movement execution. Yet, it remains unclear to what extent intended hand movement direction can be predicted from brain signals recorded during movement planning. Furthermore, whether other oscillatory features beyond power are also involved in direction encoding is not fully understood. Here, we set out to probe the directional-tuning of oscillatory phase, amplitude and Phase-Amplitude Coupling (PAC) during motor planning and execution, using a machine learning framework on multi-site local field potentials (LFPs) in humans. To this end, we recorded intracranial EEG data from implanted epilepsy patients as they performed a four-direction delayed center-out motor task. We found that LFP power significantly predicted hand-movement direction at execution but also during planning. While successful classification during planning primarily involved low-frequency power in a fronto-parietal circuit, decoding during execution was largely mediated by higher frequency activity in motor and premotor areas. Interestingly, LFP phase at very low frequencies (<1.5 Hz) led to significant decoding in premotor brain regions during execution. The machine learning framework also showed PAC to be uniformly modulated across directions through the task. Cross-temporal generalization analyses revealed that several stable brain patterns in prefrontal and premotor brain regions encode directions across both planning and execution. Finally, multivariate classification led to an increase in overall decoding accuracy (>80%) during both planning and execution. The novel insights revealed here extend our understanding of the role of neural oscillations in encoding motor plans.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Surfing beta burst waveforms to improve motor imagery-based BCI 97%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 96%
- Neural correlates of kinematic features of passive finger movement revealed by univariate and multivariate fMRI analyses 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Context-Dependent Modulations of Subthalamo-Cortical Synchronization during Rapid Reversals of Movement Direction in Parkinson's Disease 96%
- Spontaneous Neuronal Oscillations in the Human Insula are Hierarchically Organized Traveling Waves 96%
- Electrocorticographic dissociation of alpha and beta rhythmic activity in the human sensorimotor system 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Gesture Decoding Performance Using Signals from Posterior Parietal Cortex: A Stereo-Electroencephalograhy (SEEG) Study 96%
- Sensorimotor brain-computer interface performance depends on signal-to-noise ratio but not connectivity of the mu rhythm in a multiverse analysis of longitudinal data 96%
- Data-driven spatial filtering for improved measurement of cortical tracking of multiple representations of speech 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conflict detection in a sequential decision task is associated with increased cortico-subthalamic coherence and prolonged subthalamic oscillatory response in the beta band. 96%
- The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-field Coupling across the Human Neocortex 95%
- Temporal signatures of criticality in human cortical excitability as probed by early somatosensory responses 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.