Probing hippocampal stimulation in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy with functional MRI
Schwaderlapp, N.; Paschen, E.; LeVan, P.; von Elverfeldt, D.; Haas, C. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundElectrical neurostimulation is a potentially effective therapy in epilepsy but the optimal approach is not yet clear. The parameter space is wide and the effects of different stimulations are not immediately obvious. Functional MRI (fMRI) can reveal which brain areas are affected by stimulation and help understand the induced effects. However, simultaneous deep brain stimulation (DBS)-fMRI examinations in patients are rare and the possibility to investigate multiple stimulation protocols is limited. Preclinical stimulation-fMRI studies can provide predictive value and help identify optimal neurostimulation parameters. ObjectiveTo systematically investigate the brain-wide responses to hippocampal electrical stimulations in a mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) using fMRI. MethodsWe applied electrical stimulation in the intrahippocampal kainate mouse model of mTLE and assessed the effect of different stimulation amplitudes (80-230 {micro}A) and frequencies (1-100 Hz). In addition, the effect of prolonged 1 Hz stimulation was explored. Saline-injected mice served as controls. ResultsVarying the stimulation amplitudes had little effect on the resulting activation patterns. Low frequency stimulation led to a local response at the stimulation site only, whereas high frequency resulted in a spread of activation from the hippocampal formation into cortical and frontal areas. Prolonged low frequency stimulation reduced excitability. ConclusionsWhile the amplitude parameter offers little opportunity to vary the outcome, the frequency represented the key parameter and determined whether the induced activation remained local or spread across the brain. This is in line with the few DBS-fMRI results obtained in epilepsy patients demonstrating the translational value of fMRI.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Simultaneous stereo-EEG and high-density scalp EEG recordings to study the effects of intracerebral stimulation parameters 97%
- Biophysical mechanisms of electroconvulsive therapy-induced volume expansion in the medial temporal lobe: a longitudinal in vivo human imaging study 95%
- Spike-wave discharges during low-current thalamic deep brain stimulation in mice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human and Rodent Seizures Demonstrate a Dynamic Interplay with Spreading Depolarizations 94%
- Long-term hippocampal low-frequency stimulation alleviates focal seizures, memory deficits and synaptic pathology in epileptic mice 93%
- Quantification of seizure termination patterns reveals limited pathways to seizure end 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interictal waking and sleep electrophysiological properties of the thalamus in focal epilepsies 94%
- Excitation/Inhibition balance relates to cognitive function and gene expression in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: an hdEEG assessment with aperiodic exponent 94%
- Low frequency interictal EEG biomarker for localizing seizures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 94%
- Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex 94%
- Thalamic deep brain stimulation modulates circadian and infradian cycles of seizure risk in epilepsy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Low entropy map of brain oscillatory activity identifies spatially localized events: a new method for automated epilepsy focus prediction 94%
- A key role of the hippocampal P3 in the attentional blink 94%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.