Explainable Machine Learning Reveals the Role of the Breast Tumor Microenvironment in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Outcome
Azimzade, Y.; Haugen, M.; Tekpli, X.; Steen, C. B.; Fleischer, T.; Kilburn, D.; Ma, H.; Egeland, E. V.; Mills, G.; Engebraaten, O.; Kristensen, V. N.; Frigessi, A.; Kohn-Luque, A.
Show abstract
Recent advancements in single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) have enabled the identification of phenotypic diversity within breast tumor tissues. However, the contribution of these cell phenotypes to tumor biology and treatment response has remained less understood. This is primarily due to the limited number of available samples and the inherent heterogeneity of breast tumors. To address this limitation, we leverage a state-of-the-art scRNA-seq atlas and employ CIBER-SORTx to estimate cell phenotype fractions by de-convolving bulk expression profiles in more than 2000 samples from patients who have undergone Neoad-juvant Chemotherapy (NAC). We introduce a pipeline based on explainable Machine Learning (XML) to robustly explore the associations between different cell phenotype fractions and the response to NAC in the general population as well as different subtypes of breast tumors. By comparing tumor subtypes, we observe that multiple cell types exhibit a distinct association with pCR within each subtype. Specifically, Dendritic cells (DCs) exhibit a negative association with pathological Complete Response (pCR) in Estrogen Receptor positive, ER+, (Luminal A/B) tumors, while showing a positive association with pCR in ER-(Basal-like/HER2-enriched) tumors. Analysis of new spatial cyclic immunoflu-orescence data and publicly available imaging mass cytometry data showed significant differences in the spatial distribution of DCs between ER subtypes. These variations underscore disparities in the engagement of DCs within the tumor microenvironment (TME), potentially driving their divergent associations with pCR across tumor subtypes. Overall, our findings on 28 different cell types provide a comprehensive understanding of the role played by cellular compo-nents of the TME in NAC outcomes. They also highlight directions for further experimental investigations at a mechanistic level.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting tumor immune microenvironment and checkpoint therapy response of head & neck cancer patients from blood immune single-cell transcriptomics 94%
- WNT4 regulates cellular metabolism via intracellular activity at the mitochondria in breast and gynecologic cancers 93%
- Transformer-based deep learning integrates multi-omic data with cancer pathways 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 96%
- The Epithelial and Stromal Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis Reveals Prognostic Factors with Digital Cytometry 94%
- Heterogeneity in signaling pathway activity within primary and between primary and metastatic breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunohistochemical Profiling of Histone Modification Biomarkers Identifies Subtype-Specific Epigenetic Signatures and Potential Drug Targets in Breast Cancer 94%
- Unveiling epigenetic regulatory elements associated with breast cancer development 94%
- Pro-apoptotic and anti-invasive properties underscore the tumor suppressing impact of myoglobin on subset of human breast cancer cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The novel microRNAs hsa-miR-nov7 and hsa-miR-nov3 are over-expressed in locally advanced breast cancer 94%
- STmiR: A Novel XGBoost-Based Framework for Spatially Resolved miRNA Activity Prediction 93%
- Tumor purity adjusted beta values improve biological interpretability of high-dimensional DNA methylation data 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.