Prediction of mycotoxin response of DNA-wrapped nanotube sensor with machine learning
Rabbani, Y.; Behjat, S.; Lambert, B.; Sajjadi, S. H.; Shariaty-Niassar, M.; Boghossian, A.
Show abstract
DNA-wrapped single-walled carbon nanotubes (DNA-SWCNTs) have demonstrated great versatility as optical sensors. SWCNTs emit a near-infrared fluorescence that is responsive to the slightest changes in their environment, enabling the creation of sensors that can respond to single-molecule fluctuations within the vicinity of their surfaces. The fluorescence response and surface interactions of these sensors are determined by the DNA wrapping sequence. However, the lack of information on the relationship between the DNA sequence and its effect on the SWCNT fluorescence remains a bottleneck for designing sensors specific to analytes of interest. The use of directed evolution was recently demonstrated in order to evolve SWCNT sensors towards mycotoxins through iterative cycles of DNA mutation, screening and selection. In the current work, we use the data acquired during the directed evolution of DNA-SWCNT sensors to train machine learning (ML) algorithms. Artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were used to predict the response of DNA-SWCNT sensors to the mycotoxin. The reliability of the models was assessed through cross-validation. The cross-validated ANN and SVM models were able to accurately classify the various DNA-SWCNTs as yielding either a high or low fluorescence response with an accuracy of 73 and 81%, respectively. The models were further tested on alternative similar and dissimilar DNA sequences outside of the initial training dataset. The ANN model showed a better ability to predict dissimilar DNA sequences resulting in a high sensor response in comparison with the SVM model. In addition, the possibility to combine the two SVM and ANN models with directed evolution methods was investigated. The experimental results showed that the SVM model was able to predict the response of DNA-SWCNT sensors with 95% accuracy. Finally, the Hierarchy and k-means++ clustering methods were used to examine the similarity and dissimilarity of each DNA sequence at every stage of our investigation. In this work, we show that the application of ML algorithms to directed evolution libraries of DNA allows one to accurately map the performances of DNA-SWCNT sensors within a particular DNA sequence space. Moreover, the computational success of this mapping provides a framework for replacing current empirical approaches with the rational design of DNA sequences for SWCNT sensing.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fluorinated oil-surfactant mixtures with the density of water: artificial cells for synthetic biology 95%
- A low-cost smart system for electrophoresis-based nucleic acids detection at the visible spectrum 94%
- Bleaching correction for DNA-measurements in highly diluted solutions using confocal microscopy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrochemical detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in blood plasma with surface-modified electroless nickel immersion gold (ENIG) printed circuit board (PCB) electrodes 94%
- Highly Sensitive Detection of Campylobacter spp. in Chicken Meat using a Silica Nanoparticle Enhanced Dot Blot DNA Biosensor 94%
- Ultra-sensitive nanozyme-based chemiluminescence paper test for rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine on human lung carcinoma cells in vitro by means of Raman spectroscopy and imaging. 94%
- NanoTox: Development of a parsimonious in silico model for toxicity assessment of metal-oxide nanoparticles using physicochemical features 94%
- Plausible Mechanistic Insights in Biofilm Eradication Potential of against Candida spp. using In Situ Synthesized Tyrosol Functionalized Chitosan Gold Nanoparticles as a versatile Antifouling Coating on Implant Surfaces 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.