Back

Slave Trade and Colonial Expansion Resulted in Strong Sex-Biased Admixture in South Africa

Reynolds, A.; Schurz, H.; Meeks, G.; Gravel, S.; Myrick, J. W.; Mendez, F. L.; Werely, C.; van Helden, P. D.; Hoal, E. G.; Poznik, G. D.; Kim, M.; Uren, C.; Underhill, P. A.; Möller, M.; Henn, B. M.

2023-09-11 genetics
10.1101/2023.09.06.556626 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The colonial-period arrival of Europeans in southern Africa is associated with strong sex-biased migration by which male settlers displaced indigenous Khoekhoe and San men. Simultaneously, the importation of South Asian, Indonesian and Eastern African slaves may have contributed female-biased migration to Cape Town and surrounding areas. We examine the spatial and temporal spread of sex-biased migration from the Cape northward into Namaqualand and the southern Kalahari using genetic data from more than 1,400 individuals. In all regions, admixture patterns were sex-biased, with evidence of a greater male contribution of European ancestry and greater female contribution of Khoe-San ancestry. While admixture among Khoe-San, European, equatorial African, and Asian groups has likely been continuous from the founding of Cape Town to present-day, we find that Khoe-San groups further north experienced a single pulse of European admixture 6-8 generations ago. European admixture was followed by additional Khoe-San gene flow, potentially reflecting an aggregation of indigenous groups due to disruption by colonial interlopers. Male migration into the northern frontier territories was not a homogenous group of expanding Afrikaners and slaves. The Nama show evidence of distinct founder effects and derive 15% of their male lineages from Asian men, a pattern absent in the =Khomani San. Khoe-San ancestry from the paternal line is greatly diminished in populations from Cape Town, the Cederberg Mountains and Upington, but remains more frequent in self-identified ethnically indigenous groups. Strikingly, we estimate that Khoe-San Y-chromosomes were experiencing unprecedented population growth at the time of European arrival. Our findings shed light on the patterns of admixture and the population history of South Africa as the colonial frontier expanded.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
15.2%
2
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.9%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.9%
5
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
11
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
13
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
15
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
17
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%