Back

Social Context and Drug Cues Modulate Inhibitory Control in Cocaine Addiction: involvement of the STN evidenced through Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Terenzi, D.; Simon, N.; Gachomba, M. J. M.; de Peretti, J. L.; Nazarian, B.; Sein, J.; Anton, J.-L.; Grandjean, D.; Baunez, C.; Chaminade, T.

2023-09-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.09.06.556336 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAddictions often develop in a social context, although the influence of social factors did not receive much attention in the neuroscience of addiction. Recent animal studies suggest that peer presence can reduce cocaine intake, an influence potentially mediated, among others, by the subthalamic nucleus (STN). However, there is to date no such neurobiological study in humans. MethodsThis study investigated the impact of social context and drug cues on brain correlates of inhibitory control in individuals with and without cocaine use disorder (CUD) using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Seventeen CUD participants and 17 healthy controls (HC) performed a novel fMRI Stop-Signal task in the presence and absence of an observer while being exposed to cocaine-related and neutral pictures as cues. ResultsThe results showed that CUD participants, while slower at stopping with neutral cues, recovered control level stopping abilities with cocaine cues, while HC did not show any difference. Neuroimaging revealed the involvement of frontal cortical regions and of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in inhibitory control, which was modulated by both social context and drug cues in CUD participants but not in HC. ConclusionsThese findings highlight the impact of social context and drug cues on inhibitory control in CUD and suggest potential targets for intervention such as the STN, also emphasizing the importance of considering the social context in addiction research and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.