Back

Intervertebral Disc Elastography to Relate Shear Modulus and Relaxometry in Compression and Bending

Davis, Z. R.; Gossett, P. C.; Wilson, R. L.; Kim, W.; Mei, Y.; Butz, K. D.; Emery, N. C.; Nauman, E. A.; Avril, S.; Neu, C. P.; Chan, D. D.

2023-09-05 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.09.01.555817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration is the most recognized cause of low back pain, characterized by the decline of tissue structure and mechanics. Image-based mechanical parameters (e.g., strain, stiffness) may provide an ideal assessment of disc function that is lost with degeneration but unfortunately remains underdeveloped. Moreover, it is unknown whether strain or stiffness of the disc may be predicted by MRI relaxometry (e.g. T1 or T2), an increasingly accepted quantitative measure of disc structure. In this study, we quantified T1 and T2 relaxation times and in-plane strains using displacement-encoded MRI within the disc under physiological levels of compression and bending. We then estimated shear modulus in orthogonal image planes and compared these values to relaxation times and strains within regions of the disc. Intratissue strain depended on the loading mode, and shear modulus in the nucleus pulposus was typically an order of magnitude lower than the annulus fibrosis, except in bending, where the apparent stiffness depended on the loading. Relative shear moduli estimated from strain data derived under compression generally did not correspond with those from bending experiments, with no correlations in the sagittal plane and only 4 of 15 regions correlated in the coronal plane, suggesting that future inverse models should incorporate multiple loading conditions. Strain imaging and strain-based estimation of material properties may serve as imaging biomarkers to distinguish healthy and diseased discs. Additionally, image-based elastography and relaxometry may be viewed as complementary measures of disc structure and function to assess degeneration in longitudinal studies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
7
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
11
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
28
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%