Back

Characterization of low copy number human angiotensin-convertase 2 (hACE2)-transgenic mice as an improved model of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Bradshaw, C. M.; Georgieva, T.; Tankersley, T. N.; Taylor-Doyle, T.; Johnson, L.; Uhrlaub, J. L.; Besselsen, D.; Nikolich, J. Z.

2023-09-01 immunology
10.1101/2023.08.31.555800 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coronaviridae are significant human pathogens, as evidenced by several outbreaks of severe respiratory infections in the past 20 years and culminating with the COVID-19 pandemic. Mouse models of COVID-19 have included transgenic expression of the main SARS coronavirus entry receptor on human cells, human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). However, the original hACE2-Tg mouse strain overexpresses many copies of the transgene, leading to neuropathology not representative of human infection. Aiming to improve physiological relevance, we generated two new lines of hACE2-Tg mice using the original transgene construct expressing hACE2 under the control of the keratin 18 promoter (K18-hACE2). We show that relative to the original strain, which expressed 8 copies of the transgene (8-hACE2-Tg), lines 1 and 2 expressed 1 and 2 copies of the transgene (1-hACE-2-Tg and 2-hACE-2-Tg, respectively). Upon intranasal (i.n.) infection with 103 plaque-forming units (pfu) SARS-CoV-2 WA-1/US, 8-hACE2-Tg mice succumbed to infection by d. 7. 2-hACE2-Tg mice exhibited 31% survival, with less viral replication in the lung and brain when compared to 8-hACE2-Tg mice. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection in 1-hACE2-Tg mice exhibited no mortality and had no detectable virus in the brain, although they did show clear virus replication in the lung. All three mouse strains analyzed showed SARS-CoV-2-related weight loss that tracked with the mortality rates. 1-hACE2-Tg mice mounted detectable primary and memory T effector cell and antibody responses. We conclude that these strains, particularly 1-hACE2-Tg mice, provide improved models to study hACE2-mediated viral infections.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.