Back

A Longitudinal Study of Executive Function in Daily Life in Male Fragile X Premutation Carriers and Association with FXTAS Conversion

Hessl, D.; Mandujano, K.; Ferrer, E.; Espinal, G.; Famula, J.; Schneider, A.; Hagerman, R.; Tassone, F.; Rivera, S.

2023-09-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.08.31.23294855 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMen with fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) often develop executive dysfunction, characterized by disinhibition, frontal dyscontrol of movement, and working memory and attention changes. Although cross-sectional studies have suggested that earlier executive function changes may precede FXTAS, the lack of longitudinal studies have made it difficult to address this hypothesis. MethodsThis study included 66 FMR1 premutation carriers (PC) ranging from 40-78 years (Mean=59.5) and 31 well-matched healthy controls (HC) ages 40-75 (Mean 57.7) at baseline. Eighty-four participants returned for 2-5 follow up visits over a duration of 1 to 9 years (Mean=4.6); 28 of the PC developed FXTAS. The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version (BRIEF-A) was completed by participants and their spouses/partners at each visit. ResultsLongitudinal mixed model regression analyses showed a greater decline with age in PC compared to HC on the Metacognition Index (MI; self-initiation, working memory, organization, task monitoring). Conversion to FXTAS was associated with worsening MI and Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI; inhibition, flexibility, emotion modulation). For spouse/partner report, FXTAS conversion was associated with worsening MI. Finally, BRIEF-A executive function problems at baseline significantly predicted later development of FXTAS. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that executive function changes represent a prodrome of the later movement disorder.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.