Back

Chromatin Profiling of CBFA2T3-GLIS2 AMLs Identifies Key Transcription Factor Dependencies and BRG1 Inhibition as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy

Kaonis, S.; Smith, J. L.; Katiyar, N.; Merrill, M.; Hylkema, T.; Namciu, S.; Le, Q.; Babaeva, E.; Ikeda, T.; Morris, S. M.; Girard, E.; Furuyama, S.; Ries, R.; Bernstein, I.; Meshinchi, S.; Henikoff, S.; Meers, M. P.; Hadland, B. K.; Sarthy, J. F.

2023-09-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.08.30.555598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oncogenic fusions involving transcription factors are present in the majority of pediatric leukemias; however, the context-specific mechanisms they employ to drive cancer remain poorly understood. CBFA2T3-GLIS2 (C/G) fusions occur in treatment-refractory acute myeloid leukemias and are restricted to young children. To understand how the C/G fusion drives oncogenesis we applied CUT&RUN chromatin profiling to an umbilical cord blood/endothelial cell (EC) co-culture model of C/G AML that recapitulates the biology of this malignancy. We find C/G fusion binding is mediated by its zinc finger domains. Integration of fusion binding sites in C/G- transduced cells with Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) sites in control cord blood cells identifies MYCN, ZFPM1, ZBTB16 and LMO2 as direct C/G targets. Transcriptomic analysis of a large pediatric AML cohort shows that these genes are upregulated in C/G patient samples. Single cell RNA-sequencing of umbilical cord blood identifies a population of megakaryocyte precursors that already express many of these genes despite lacking the fusion. By integrating CUT&RUN data with CRISPR dependency screens we identify BRG1/SMARCA4 as a vulnerability in C/G AML. BRG1 profiling in C/G patient-derived cell lines shows that the CBFA2T3 locus is a binding site, and treatment with clinically-available BRG1 inhibitors reduces fusion levels and downstream C/G targets including N-MYC, resulting in C/G leukemia cell death and extending survival in a murine xenograft model.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.