Online Bayesian Optimization of Nerve Stimulation
Wernisch, L.; Edwards, T.; Berthon, A.; Tessier-Lariviere, O.; Sarkans, E.; Stoukidi, M.; Fortier-Poisson, P.; Pinkney, M.; Thornton, M.; Hanley, C.; Lee, S.; Jennings, J.; Appleton, B.; Garsed, P.; Patterson, B.; Buttinger, W.; Gonshaw, S.; Jakopec, M.; Shunmugam, S.; Mamen, J.; Tukiainen, A.; Lajoie, G.; Armitage, O.; Hewage, E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveIn bioelectronic medicine, neuromodulation therapies induce neural signals to the brain or organs modifying their function. Stimulation devices, capable of triggering exogenous neural signals using electrical wave forms, require a complex and multi-dimensional parameter space in order to control such wave forms. Determining the best combination of parameters (wave form optimization, or dosing) for treating a particular patients illness is therefore challenging. Comprehensive parameter searching for an optimal stimulation effect is often infeasible in a clinical setting, due to the size of the parameter space. Restricting this space, however, may lead to sub-optimal therapeutic results, reduced responder rates, and adverse effects. ApproachAs an alternative to a full parameter search, we present a flexible machine learning, data acquisition and processing framework for optimizing neural stimulation parameters requiring as few steps as possible using Bayesian optimization. Such optimization builds a model of the neural and physiological responses to stimulations enabling it to optimize stimulation parameters and to provide estimates of the accuracy of the response model. The vagus nerve innervates, among other thoracic and visceral organs, the heart, thus controlling heart rate and is therefore ideal for demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach. Main results. The efficacy of our optimization approach was first evaluated on simulated neural responses, then applied to vagus nerve stimulation intraoperatively in porcine subjects. Optimization converged quickly on parameters achieving target heart rates and optimizing neural B-fibre activations despite high intersubject variability. SignificanceAn optimized stimulation waveform was achieved in real time with far fewer stimulations than required by alternative optimization strategies, thus minimizing exposure to side effects. Uncertainty estimates helped avoiding stimulations outside a safe range. Our approach shows that a complex set of neural stimulation parameters can be optimized in real-time for a patient to achieve a personalized precision dosing.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian optimization of cortical neuroprosthetic vision using perceptual feedback 98%
- Combining biophysical models and machine learning to optimize implant geometry and stimulation protocol for intraneural electrodes 97%
- End-to-end Learning of Safe Stimulation Parameters for Cortical Neuroprosthetic Vision 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- BlueRecording: A Pipeline for the efficient calculation of extracellular recordings in large-scale neural circuit models 95%
- Personalized Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Effective Neurointervention Across Participants 94%
- kCSD-python, reliable current source density estimation with quality control 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Leadfield-Free Optimization Framework for Transcranially Applied Electric Currents 94%
- NeoCOMM: A Neocortical Neuroinspired Computational Model for the Reconstruction and Simulation of Epileptiform Events 92%
- Key Factors in the Cortical Response to Transcranial Electrical Stimulations--A Multi-Scale Modeling Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal Multichannel Artifact Prediction and Removal for Brain Machine Interfaces and Neural Prosthetics 94%
- Simulation of closed-loop deep brain stimulation control schemes for suppression of pathological beta oscillations in Parkinson's disease 94%
- Endogenous signals during active movement predict deep brain stimulation evoked potential pathways: Results of a transfer function analysis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.