Back

Sexual health in women with Parkinson's disease: Motor, non-motor, and social impacts

Nobrega, K.; Nascimento, I.; Souza, B. R.; Goncalves, R.; Martins, T.; Ferreira, G.; Silva, B. E.; Helene, A.; Roque, A. C.; Savica, R.; Piemonte, M. E.

2023-08-31 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2023.08.30.23294846 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSexual dysfunction (SD) is a common non-motor symptom (NMS) in people with Parkinsons disease (PwPD). Sexual health (SH) depends on several biological, mental, and social factors that PD may affect. Despite its prevalence and relevance for quality of life, SD in women with Parkinsons disease (WwPD) is poorly understood, and research in this area is scarce. ObjectivesTo investigate the impact of motor, non-motor, and social aspects on the SH of WwPD. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 100 women (mean age 54.45{+/-}8.31, mean H&Y stage 1.70{+/-}0.71). The following data were collected for each person (used tests/scales indicated within parentheses and defined in Glossary): (1) demographic information and global cognitive capacity (T-MoCA); (2) non-motor aspects of daily life experiences (MDS-UPDRS, part I); (3) motor aspects of daily life experiences (MDS-UPDRS, part II); (4) fatigue (FSS); (5) self-esteem (RSES); (6) sleep disorder (PDSS); (7) couple relationship quality (CRQ) (DAS); (8) depressive signals (BDI); (8) short-term sexual health (FSFI); and (9) long-term sexual health (SQ-F). ResultsOur results suggest that depressive symptoms, preserved cognitive status, and CRQ are predictive factors in the sexual health of WwPD. Age, disease onset, duration, postmenopausal, Levodopa dosage, motor disability, and fatigue were not correlated with SH. ConclusionOur findings emphasize the need to assess the sexual functioning of WwPD to investigate which motor, non-motor, and social aspects may be involved in SD so that measures can be implemented in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.