Back

The predictive capacity of polygenic risk scores for disease risk is only moderately influenced by imputation panels tailored to the target population

Levi, H.; Elkon, R.; Shamir, R.

2023-08-29 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2023.08.29.23294769
Show abstract

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) predict individuals genetic risk of developing complex diseases. They summarize the effect of many genetic variants discovered in genome-wide association studies (GWASs). However, to date, large GWASs exist primarily for the European population and the quality of PRS prediction declines when applied to target sets of other ethnicities. A key step in using a PRS is imputation, which is the inference of un-typed SNPs using a set of fully-sequenced individuals, called the imputation panel. The SNP genotypes called by the imputation process depend on the ethnic composition of the imputation panel. Several studies have shown that imputing genotypes using a panel that contains individuals of the same ethnicity as the genotyped individuals improves imputation accuracy. However, until now, there has been no systematic investigation into the influence of the ethnic composition of imputation panels on the accuracy of PRS predictions when applied to ethnic groups that differ from the population used in the GWAS. In this study we estimated the effect of imputation of the target set on prediction accuracy of PRS when the discovery (GWAS) and the target sets come from different ethnic groups. We analyzed twelve binary phenotypes and three populations from the UK Biobank (Europeans, South-Asians, and Africans). We generated imputation panels from several ethnic groups, imputed the target set using each panel, and generated PRS to compute individuals risk scores. Then, we assessed the prediction accuracy obtained from each imputation panel. Our analysis indicates that using an imputation panel matched to the ethnic group of the target population yields only a marginal improvement and only under specific conditions. Hence, while a target-matched imputation panel can potentially improve prediction accuracy of European PRSs in non-EUR populations, the improvement is limited.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
based on 24 papers
Top 0.1%
9.6%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 17%
9.6%
3
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 2%
6.0%
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 0.2%
5.5%
6
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 0.5%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 75%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 22%
2.8%
11
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 5%
2.3%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 4%
2.2%
14
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 0.6%
2.2%
15
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.4%
2.1%
16
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 19%
1.5%
17
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Genetic Epidemiology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 5%
1.5%
20
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Epidemiology
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 11%
0.6%
25
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
based on 37 papers
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 6%
0.6%