Back

Changes in respiratory infection trends during the COVID-19 pandemic in the haematologic malignancy patients

RYOO, J.; Kim, S. C.; Lee, J.

2023-08-29 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.08.29.23294751 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic globally changed respiratory infection patterns. However, its impact on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in high risk patients with haematological malignancies (HM) is uncertain. We aimed to examine CAP aetiology changes in patients with HM pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis retrospective study included 524 HM patients hospitalised with CAP between March 2018 and February 2022. Those who underwent bronchoscopy within 24 hours after admission to identify CAP aetiology were included. Data on patient characteristics, laboratory findings, and results of bronchioalveolar lavage fluid cultures and PCR tests were analysed to compare etiological changes and identify in-hospital mortality risk factors. ResultsPatients were divided into pre-COVID-19 (44.5%) and post-COVID-19 (55.5%) groups. This study found a significant decrease in viral CAP in the post-COVID-19 era, particularly for influenza A, parainfluenza, adenovirus, and rhinovirus (3.0% vs. 0.3%, respectively, P = 0.036; 6.5% vs. 0.7%, respectively, P = 0.001; 5.6% vs. 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.015; 9.5% vs. 1.7%, respectively, P < 0.001). Bacterial, fungal, and unknown CAP aetiologies remain unchanged. Higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and lower platelet count correlated with in-hospital mortality after adjusting for potential confounding factors. ConclusionThe incidence of CAP in HM patients did not decrease after COVID-19. Additionally, CAP aetiology among patients with HM changed following the COVID-19 pandemic, with a significant reduction in viral pneumonia while bacterial and fungal pneumonia persisted. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the prognosis of patients with HM and CAP.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.