A Novel Computational Approach for the Mining of Signature Pathways Using Species Co-occurrence Networks in Gut Microbiomes
Kim, S.; Thapa, I.; Ali, H.
Show abstract
Advances in metagenome sequencing data continue to enable new methods for analyzing biological systems. When handling microbial profile data, metagenome sequencing has proven to be far more comprehensive than traditional methods such as 16s rRNA data, which rely on partial sequences. Microbial community profiling can be used to obtain key biological signals that pave the way for better and accurate understanding of complex systems that are critical for advancing biomedical research and healthcare. There have been few attempts to uncover microbial community associations with certain health conditions. However, such attempts have mostly used partial or incomplete data to accurately capture those associations. This study introduces a novel computational approach for the identification of co-occurring microbial communities using the abundance and functional roles of species-level microbiome data. The proposed approach is then used to identify signature pathways associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Furthermore, we developed a computational pipeline to identify microbial species co-occurrences from metagenome data. When comparing IBD to a control group, we show that co-occurring communities of species are enriched for potential pathways. We also show that the identified co-occurring microbial species operate as a community to facilitate pathway enrichment. The obtained findings suggest that the proposed network model, along with the computational pipeline, provide a valuable analytical tool to analyze complex biological systems and extract pathway signatures that classify or diagnose certain health conditions. CCS CONCEPTS* Applied computing [->] Biological networks; Bioinformatics; Systems biology. ACM Reference FormatSuyeon Kim, Ishwor Thapa, and Hesham Ali. 2023. A Novel Computational Approach for the Mining of Signature Pathways Using Species Co-occurrence Networks in Gut Microbiomes. In Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of enhanced insect feeding on the faecal microbiota and transcriptome of a family of captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) 95%
- Phylogeny analysis of whole protein-coding genes in metagenomic data detected an environmental gradient for the microbiota 95%
- MinION Sequencing of colorectal cancer tumour microbiomes - a comparison with amplicon-based and RNA-Sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-analysis of Microbiome Association Networks Reveal Patterns of Dysbiosis in Diseased Microbiomes 97%
- Hypothesizing mechanistic links between microbes and disease using knowledge graphs 97%
- Comparison of the effectiveness of different normalization methods for metagenomic cross-study phenotype prediction under heterogeneity 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Body Index with Fecal Microbiome in Children Cohorts with Ethnic-Geographic Factor Interaction: Accurately Using a Bayesian Zero-inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model 96%
- Identification and predictive machine learning models construction of gut microbiota associated with lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer 95%
- GSR-DB: a manually curated and optimised taxonomical database for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SPARTA: Interpretable functional classification of microbiomes and detection of hidden cumulative effects. 95%
- Individualized network analysis reveals a link between the gut microbiome, diet intervention and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus 95%
- MiMeNet: Exploring Microbiome-Metabolome Relationships using Neural Networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.