The genomic landscape, causes, and consequences of extensive phylogenomic discordance in Old World mice and rats
Thomas, G. W. C.; Hughes, J. J.; Kumon, T.; Berv, J. S.; Nordgren, C. E.; Lampson, M.; Levine, M.; Searle, J. B.; Good, J. M.
Show abstract
A species tree is a central concept in evolutionary biology whereby a single branching phylogeny reflects relationships among species. However, the phylogenies of different genomic regions often differ from the species tree. Although tree discordance is often widespread in phylogenomic studies, we still lack a clear understanding of how variation in phylogenetic patterns is shaped by genome biology or the extent to which discordance may compromise comparative studies. We characterized patterns of phylogenomic discordance across the murine rodents (Old World mice and rats) - a large and ecologically diverse group that gave rise to the mouse and rat model systems. Combining new linked-read genome assemblies for seven murine species with eleven published rodent genomes, we first used ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) to infer a robust species tree. We then used whole genomes to examine finer-scale patterns of discordance and found that phylogenies built from proximate chromosomal regions had similar phylogenies. However, there was no relationship between tree similarity and local recombination rates in house mice, suggesting that genetic linkage influences phylogenetic patterns over deeper timescales. This signal may be independent of contemporary recombination landscapes. We also detected a strong influence of linked selection whereby purifying selection at UCEs led to less discordance, while genes experiencing positive selection showed more discordant and variable phylogenetic signals. Finally, we show that assuming a single species tree can result in high error rates when testing for positive selection under different models. Collectively, our results highlight the complex relationship between phylogenetic inference and genome biology and underscore how failure to account for this complexity can mislead comparative genomic studies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-scale profiling reveals higher proportions of phylogenetic signal in non-coding data 98%
- Optimizing Phylogenomics with Rapidly Evolving Long Exons: Comparison with Anchored Hybrid Enrichment and Ultraconserved Elements 97%
- The genome of the endangered dryas monkey provides new insights into the evolutionary history of the vervets 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dosage-sensitive functions in embryonic development drove the survival of genes on sex-specific chromosomes in snakes, birds, and mammals 95%
- Extreme genome scrambling in cryptic Oikopleura dioica species 95%
- An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid evolution of recombination landscapes during the divergence of cichlid ecotypes in Lake Masoko 95%
- Patterns of speciation are similar across mountainous and lowland regions for a Neotropical plant radiation (Costaceae: Costus) 95%
- Cenozoic evolutionary history obscures the Mesozoic origins of acanthopterygian fishes 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.