Back

Discovery of 2-amide-3-methylester thiophenes inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 ADP-ribosyl hydrolysing macrodomain and coronavirus replication

Wazir, S.; Parviainen, T. A. O.; Maksimainen, M. M.; Duong, M. T. H.; Pfannenstiel, J. J.; Cluff, D.; Sowa, S. T.; Galera-Prat, A.; Ferraris, D. V.; Fehr, A.; Heiskanen, J. P.; Lehtiö, L.

2023-08-29 biochemistry
10.1101/2023.08.28.555062 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has made it clear that further development of antiviral therapies will be needed to combat additional SARS-CoV-2 variants or novel CoVs. Here, we describe small molecule inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 Mac1, which counters ADP-ribosylation mediated innate immune responses. The compounds inhibiting Mac1 were discovered through high-throughput screening (HTS) using a protein FRET-based competition assay and the best hit compound had an IC50 of 14 {micro}M. Three validated HTS hits have the same 2-amide-3-methylester thiophene scaffold and the scaffold was selected for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies through commercial and synthesized analogs. We studied the compound binding mode in detail using X-ray crystallography and this allowed us to focus on specific features of the compound and design analogs. Compound 27 (MDOLL-0229) had an IC50 of 2.1 {micro}M and was generally selective for CoV Mac1 proteins after profiling for activity against a panel of viral and human ADP-ribose binding proteins. The improved potency allowed testing of its effect on virus replication and indeed, 27 inhibited replication of both MHVa prototype CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, sequencing of a drug-resistant MHV identified mutations in Mac1, further demonstrating the specificity of 27. Compound 27 is the first Mac1 targeted small molecule demonstrated to inhibit coronavirus replication in a cell model. This, together with its well-defined binding mode, makes 27 a good candidate for further hit/lead-optimization efforts.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.8%
2
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
ChemMedChem
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
5
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
11
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
14
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
16
Journal of Natural Products
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
18
Molecules
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Chemistry – A European Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
20
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%